RE: One question for Christians
August 27, 2013 at 6:46 pm
(This post was last modified: August 27, 2013 at 6:46 pm by Cyberman.)
I'm typing this very slowly for you, so you can keep up. I wasn't making any argument, merely an observation that literal creationists seem to be stuck in a mindset that forces them to pull the "Goddidit" ripcord and abandon their own argument as soon as they paint themselves into a corner. And you didn't disappoint. That's one reason creationists tend not to be taken seriously. I mean, it's cute when a six-year-old tells a story and has a magic butterfly swoop down from nowhere to save the plot from crashing; but a grown adult? For shame!
But please, do prove me wrong. Detail one single account of how the ark could possibly operate as a scientific reality, without once having to throw god magic into the recipe.
But please, do prove me wrong. Detail one single account of how the ark could possibly operate as a scientific reality, without once having to throw god magic into the recipe.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'