(December 29, 2013 at 2:15 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Possibly, though I saw the connection between the "it's said" and Min's "who says?"
From the standpoint of logic, a charitable reading of an opponent's reply or argument is far more defensible than an uncharitable reading. Simply from a tactical standpoint, it pays to be charitable in interpreting an opponent's reply, as being uncharitable is more likely to bite you in the ass.