(May 19, 2014 at 2:54 am)snowtracks Wrote: evolutionary biology used cladistics showing diagrams relating humans with primates and it was all a big sham. Evolutionists thought no one would notice that they interpreted the data exclusively within their theoretical paradigm to support human evolution. You should ask for you money back.
“The results of the parsimony and bootstrap tests indicate that cladistic analyses based on standard craniodental characters cannot be relied on to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships of the hominoids, papionins, and, by extension, the fossil hominins“.
http://www.pnas.org/content/97/9/5003.full
And again, all you have is a single fifteen year old paper. Funny, this thing you posted has been around for over a decade, and yet mainstream science still wholeheartedly accepts evolution! Weird!
It's probably got something to do with the fact that craniodental characters are part of a web of analyses that also include genetics and the rest of the organism, you cherry picking chucklefuck.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!