Debate with a Christian

[*Deidre*]

History books are compiled to present historical facts, while the Bible's sole purpose is to 'sell' Christianity. Period. The fact that it occasionally references some historical tidbits, is irrelevant. It is a book designed to promote Christianity, which is the reason why it was compiled. So, a Christian views it as some sort of proof of all things holy. Understandable, but it doesn't serve well in an objective sense. The historical process discipulus, isn't left up to interpretation, it still follows a protocol for deciphering the validity of facts, through agreed upon objective, reliable sources. Unfortunately, you consider the Bible a reliable source. lol

I stated my topic request, discipulus. It seems to be somewhat in line with what you wish to debate, but taking it a slight step further.