Debate with a Christian

[Esquilax]

The only counter argument you need for the claim that the gospels are true, and therefore Jesus, is "that's stupid."

I know you think that's an argument

No, I don't: I do think it's an appropriate response to someone saying that the evidence for the bible's claims can be found within the bible. Circular reasoning is stupid, and I don't apologize for saying so, especially when it's backed by such pearls of wisdom as "the existence of Jesus Christ is axiomatic."

Is this how it's going to be from now on, incidentally? You dishonestly ignoring the majority of my posts so long as there's a single insult or piece of rough language therein for you to focus on instead, and pretend that it invalidates every other thing I have to say?