Science vs Morality

[Mister Agenda]

Science is contrary to morality. From what I have seen, being moral is contrary to natural law. It's something humans had to adopt when they decided to develop cities.

It's not contrary, it's indifferent, like plumbing. It's only about what works. Science can help us be more moral if that's what we want, but it can't tell us to want it.

---

It's been suggested that city life was actually detrimental to the first humans who decided to make the change in their lifestyle. We don't know the exact reason why the change was made.

Maybe the suggestion is wrong. Or maybe it's right, and city life began as some sort of misfire of our natural urge to congregate which evolved under conditions in which cities were impossible. How does that bear on morality?