RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 3, 2014 at 6:36 pm
(November 3, 2014 at 11:41 am)Heywood Wrote:(November 3, 2014 at 11:34 am)Stimbo Wrote: Of course not, but it does show that a god isn't a requirement for it to happen.
Negative.
For it to happen you have to have unchanging Laws of Nature. Laws of Nature are about something other than themselves. The law of conservation of momentum is about conserving momentum and not about conserving itself. In order for the Law of conservation of momentum to be conserved, something must exist which conserves it. That something could very well be God.
Haha, that is the silliest thing I've read in a while. Conservation of momentum, therefore God. Emmy Noether would be so proud. Oh, did you know that it is far from clear what the correct notion of conserved energy momentum is in curved space? Take a photon undergoing cosmological redshift - it loses momentum, but whereto?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
