RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
November 30, 2014 at 12:27 am
(This post was last modified: November 30, 2014 at 12:31 am by YahwehIsTheWay.)
3. Hey Nobody Said It Wasn't True.
If Jesus hadn't really risen from the dead, surely there would have been people around at that time who would have said so. After all, it's well known that the ancient world was full of Fact Checking Commandos that would have jumped upon any rabbi scribbling something incorrect, pinned him to the ground and cried "FALSE!" The fact that we have no records of this ever happening proves that Jesus must have risen from the dead 2-3 days after the crucifixion, depending on which Gospel you read, and then risen into the sky to be with his father on that same day (Luke 24:51), eight days later (John 20:26) or 40 days later (Acts 1:3).
Look, the details aren't important. It definitely happened. Stop nit picking you heathen trash!
We know this because we have no writings of any skeptic who lived at that time who denied Jesus had risen from the dead.
![[Image: 330px-The_House_of_Leaves_-_Burning_4.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=upload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2Fd%2Fd4%2FThe_House_of_Leaves_-_Burning_4.jpg%2F330px-The_House_of_Leaves_-_Burning_4.jpg)
Furthermore, we have no writings of any skeptic for the next thousand years or so who denied that Jesus had risen from the dead.
![[Image: spanish-inquisition-rack.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s.hswstatic.com%2Fgif%2Fspanish-inquisition-rack.jpg)
Even the writings of early critics of Christianity, like those of Celsus or Thallus, only come to us as they are preserved in the writings of early Christian apologists, who had quoted these scoffers for refutation. Obviously, the works of these skeptics were so inconsequential that no one thought them worthy of preservation. So we can assume they said nothing to refute the divinity and resurrection of Jesus.
Now I know what some of you heathen trash are thinking, "Just because we don't have the writings of skeptics of Christianity doesn't mean they didn't exist." Well, allow me to shatter your faith by showing you that we have indeed preserved a written record of early skeptics who believed that Jesus wasn't a flesh-and-blood person:
So such things have been preserved, in the Bible itself. And yet the works of Celsus and Thallus are not mentioned in the Bible. Ah ha!
Checkmate atheists!
...and let's see, here's another can. Where's my can opener? ...
Yes. ...and?
If Jesus hadn't really risen from the dead, surely there would have been people around at that time who would have said so. After all, it's well known that the ancient world was full of Fact Checking Commandos that would have jumped upon any rabbi scribbling something incorrect, pinned him to the ground and cried "FALSE!" The fact that we have no records of this ever happening proves that Jesus must have risen from the dead 2-3 days after the crucifixion, depending on which Gospel you read, and then risen into the sky to be with his father on that same day (Luke 24:51), eight days later (John 20:26) or 40 days later (Acts 1:3).
Look, the details aren't important. It definitely happened. Stop nit picking you heathen trash!
We know this because we have no writings of any skeptic who lived at that time who denied Jesus had risen from the dead.
Furthermore, we have no writings of any skeptic for the next thousand years or so who denied that Jesus had risen from the dead.
Even the writings of early critics of Christianity, like those of Celsus or Thallus, only come to us as they are preserved in the writings of early Christian apologists, who had quoted these scoffers for refutation. Obviously, the works of these skeptics were so inconsequential that no one thought them worthy of preservation. So we can assume they said nothing to refute the divinity and resurrection of Jesus.
Now I know what some of you heathen trash are thinking, "Just because we don't have the writings of skeptics of Christianity doesn't mean they didn't exist." Well, allow me to shatter your faith by showing you that we have indeed preserved a written record of early skeptics who believed that Jesus wasn't a flesh-and-blood person:
The Holy Bible Wrote:1 John 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
So such things have been preserved, in the Bible itself. And yet the works of Celsus and Thallus are not mentioned in the Bible. Ah ha!
Checkmate atheists!
...and let's see, here's another can. Where's my can opener? ...
(November 30, 2014 at 12:25 am)dyresand Wrote: ...you worship the same terrible god who does the same terrible things except he is okay with people killing other people and being martyrs ...
Yes. ...and?
"You don't need facts when you got Jesus." -Pastor Deacon Fred, Landover Baptist Church
™: True Christian is a Trademark of the Landover Baptist Church. I have no affiliation with this fine group of True Christians ™ because I can't afford their tithing requirements but would like to be. Maybe someday the Lord will bless me with enough riches that I am able to.
And for the lovers of Poe, here's your winking smiley:
™: True Christian is a Trademark of the Landover Baptist Church. I have no affiliation with this fine group of True Christians ™ because I can't afford their tithing requirements but would like to be. Maybe someday the Lord will bless me with enough riches that I am able to.
And for the lovers of Poe, here's your winking smiley:
