RE: Dawkins
January 9, 2010 at 6:02 am
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2010 at 6:03 am by Edwardo Piet.)
(January 8, 2010 at 11:48 pm)Azazylix Wrote: Pippy, the fallacies and flaws are valid. Otherwise there wouldn't be so many literary responses to his books, one of which you mentioned.
(my emphasis)
Taken as pure logic... THAT'S a fallacy.
(January 9, 2010 at 4:47 am)Saerules Wrote: Silly Evie, haven't we been through this yet?
We have indeed a few times, do you wish to proceed?
EvF