RE: If you were or are a Murican, how would you vote in the 2016 election?
April 28, 2015 at 12:00 pm
(April 27, 2015 at 10:47 pm)Chuck Wrote: It's not an honorable fight, much less a good fight, if by fighting, the fighter greatly increases the probability of a worse outcome befalling those who did not chose to fight than they would otherwise have suffered, while affording only a very marginal probability, if that, of improving the lot of either the fighters or the bystander.
I don't see that going along with the duopoly presents a better alternative. Voting for either of the two parties is voting for the "worse outcome" that you worry about in this post.
Quote:Far from an honorable or a good fight, such a fight is nothing more than the self-indulgent but impotent scream at the unfairness, with the added problem of the damage it inflicts upon others, rather than coolly calculated manipulation of the odds to maximize the chance for the good.
I disagree. Trying to change the system through voting for the status quo is like fighting for peace or fucking for virginity. Voting third-party inflicts no damage on others, and while it may be an "impotent scream", it at least is not silent acquiescence.