RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
April 6, 2016 at 10:16 am
(This post was last modified: April 6, 2016 at 10:17 am by Neo-Scholastic.)
(April 1, 2016 at 12:28 am)robvalue Wrote: These things almost always amount to:Fixed that for you.
1) Make observations.
2) Announce apply binding rules logical constraints based on to these observations
3) Notice an apparent paradox caused by the rules. Exclude logically inconsistent interpretations of the data.
4) Define a special thing that violates the rules, to plug the apparent paradox. Consider the only remaining conceivable option a justified belief.