(December 21, 2015 at 3:38 pm)robvalue Wrote: You still don't understand what the words mean and have made no attempt to do so. I linked you to my website where I explained in detail, clearly you've ignored it.
You feel the need to tell us what our position is in order to dismiss it.
I'm done with you, you've a lot of growing up to do and right now you're just not ready for any kind of intellectual discussion. You are blinded by overconfidence, preconceptions and a refusal to consider the possibility that you may be wrong.
I understand perfectly well what the words mean.
What I reject is tactical redefinitions. Redefinitions designed for rhetorical, debating advantage, that are out of step with the rest of our established body of knowledge.
If you want to have a meaningful discussion, it would do you well to understand my point here. You can do all you want to justify your redefinitions, but as long as it is motivated by rhetorical reasons as opposed to substantive, analytic reasons, I can't take it seriously.
What don't you understand about this?
