RE: A Necessary Being?
August 31, 2016 at 12:33 am
(This post was last modified: August 31, 2016 at 12:39 am by Arkilogue.)
(August 30, 2016 at 11:42 pm)Whateverist Wrote: I enjoy the legend of Mighty Mouse as much as the next fiction appreciator. But .. yes. Justify what they say if you think you can.
Ever watch Danger Mouse? That was classic British humor.
What I can distill them all down to, tossing out all anthropomorphizing, is infinitely spatial substance that takes up all available space as a (scalar) field of mater in equilibrium.
So I would look into quantum physics to see if they are having to deal with re-normalizing for infinity to a single discrete motion/measure (1) in a scalar field (value but no direction). They do, all the time.
So I figure its a good place to start.
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questio...ion-layman
I mean, even trying to explain QM in layman terms is horrible. In essence, renormalization has no use of "simple terms", but if you want to be very vague, then you can say "well if you take an infinite quantity, and divide it by infinity, it's not necessarily infinity anymore and can be a finite number"... and that's what renormalization "kind of does". – Chris Gerig Jan 9 '12 at 22:35
Pretty much what I've been saying.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder