Heated debate on evolution with brother

[Fake Messiah]

Yeah like some other members mentioned "why don't you read a science book? why don't you look at the evidence?" and the difference between me (or any other rational person) and you is that I take the world as it is, I rely on observable evidence; while you have an agenda. In your case it's that Jesus rose from the dead. You start with that foundational belief then conveniently sidestep logic and reason backward to specific beliefs. Everything has to subordinate so that your fundamentalism can be untouched. Therefore since Jesus divinity makes perfect sense to you, evolution can't because that is ultimately contradictory to divinity of Jesus.

Therefore you have to ask yourself why do you believe that Jesus rose from the dead and that it wasn't a case that people lied, someone ransacked the tomb, the witnesses were unreliable (of course if Jesus even existed)?
Seriously, What evidence would prove you that Jesus was not divine/rise from the dead?

That's why when you mostly talk to religious people that deny evolution, it is rarely about the evolution itself and showing them the evidence, rather it's about their bias, their core belief on which their worldview stands on.

No one has come close to showing that even the simplest living entity could possibly assemble itself.

Again snowtracks you just prove your bias that you fail to read any science book because of Jesus. You want him to be divine so you just ignore the science.
So am I supposed to teach you here how there are these things called DNA and RNA? And how activated RNA actually builds DNA. Some viruses don’t have DNA, but they do have RNA (and yet viruses are not even considered alive although they can be killed), and this led many scientists to hypothesize life beginning in an RNA world.
RNA and DNA are both made of many-times repeated components called nucleotides. It took a while, but researchers have shown how RNA nucleotides could have formed naturally in conditions now expected of the prebiotic Earth.
But why bother because you won't care until you let your agenda away and we all know what that agenda is.


Another thing is that this is a topic about evolution and not abiogenesis. Evolution deals with changes in gene frequency in a population from one generation to the next and descent of different species from a common ancestor over many generations, but it does not deal with the emergence of the theories of life origins. Sure abiogenesis has a decent amount of evidence behind it, but nowhere near as much as evolution does. There are still hypoteses competing and the one that proposes it was Jesus' magic doesn't have much going for it.