Heated debate on evolution with brother

[downbeatplumb]

No it's not.

Where are the fossil quadrillions to the 10'th power?
There is no rational evolutionary scenario for explaining how a new animal phylum might appear. From 50 to 80 percent of the animal phyla known to have existed at any time in Earth’s history appeared within no more than a few million years of one another, as the Cambrian geological era began. There is no rational evolutionary scenario for explaining how a new animal phylum might appear. The Cambrian explosion marks the first appearance of animals with skeletons, bilateral symmetry, appendages, brains, eyes (virtually every eye design that has ever existed appears simultaneously in the Cambrian explosion), and digestive tracts. This is what your guys have to say: * 
* http://enallagma.com/reprints/Peterson%20etal%202009%20BioEssays.pdf
Page 1 -  Fact: Forty phyla of complex animals suddenly appear in the fossils record, no forerunners, no transitional forms leading to them ‘‘a major mystery,’’ a ‘‘challenge.’’ Although we would dispute the numbers, and aside from the last line, there is not much here that we would disagree with. Indeed, many of
Page 2  - Thus, elucidating the materialistic basis of the Cambrian explosion has become more elusive, not less, the more we know about the event itself, and cannot be explained away by coupling extinction of intermediates with long stretches of geologic time, despite the contrary claims of some modern neo-Darwinists…   Kevin Peterson et al. (evolutionary biologists).

This has been explained to you.
Soft bodies do not fossilise well and small or single celled organisms are hard to find.
Your argument that they magically poofed into existence is laughable and kinda sad.