Evidence for the existence of God

[Esquilax]

Well, yes, this is what I am getting at.

You won't get CCTV footage or DNA samples as evidence of God. So, what would constitute enough "proof" or "evidence" for atheists to believe in God, or at least to consider God as the most credible explanation for the existence of the universe and life on earth?

So, you establish right off the bat that your god cannot clear an extremely low bar of evidence, the sort of evidence that a common flea could provide, yet the all powerful architect of the universe apparently can't. Having done that, you then proceed to question us, as though we're somehow obligated to accept some form of evidence below that low, low bar, what we'd need. What happens if the sort of evidence you'd excluded is the sort of evidence you'd need? Is that a problem for you?

As to your god? The biblical one? No, that god can't exist. It can't, because the evidence we already have contradicts the god described in the bible so thoroughly that there's really no way to salvage it. Not really our problem that your favorite explanation is an untenable idea, though.