RE: Evidence for the existence of God
January 12, 2017 at 10:07 am
(This post was last modified: January 12, 2017 at 10:12 am by Yadayadayada.)
(January 11, 2017 at 11:30 pm)21stCenturyIconoclast Wrote:(January 11, 2017 at 4:01 pm)Yadayadayada Wrote: Atheists, please define "evidence".
Yadayadayada,
God damn it, when will you pagan god freaks ever learn?! Which god of the primitive Bronze and Iron Age are you talking about???
Don't be like the ever so inept Neo-Scholasitc, Catholic Lady, Drich, Phillip2, et al, okay? By you using the term "god," you act as though
there is only one god which is laughable! For the sake of your further embarrassment, I have included a list of many pagan
gods throughout history, so please pick from the list below in which primitive god you're referring too!
Azura Mazda, Angus, Belenos, Brigid, Dana, Lugh, Dagda, Epona, Allah Aphrodite, Apollo, Ares, Artemis, Atehna, Demeter,
Dionysus, Eris, Eos, Gaia, Hades, Hekate, Helios, Hephaestus, Hera, Hermes, Hestia, Pan, Poseidon, Selene, Uranus, Zeus,
Mathilde, Elves, Eostre, Frigg, Ganesh, Hretha, Saxnot, Shef, Shiva Thuno, Tir, Vishnu, Weyland, Woden, Yahweh, Alfar, Balder,
Beyla, Bil, Bragi, Byggvir, Dagr, Disir, Eir, Forseti, Freya, Freyr, Frigga, Heimdall, Hel, Hoenir, Idunn, Jord, Lofn, Loki, Mon,
Njord, Norns, Nott, Odin, Ran, Saga, Sif, Siofn, Skadi, Snotra, Sol, Syn, Ull, Thor, Tyr, Var, Vali, Vidar, Vor, Herne, Holda,
Nehalennia, Nerthus, Endovelicus, Ataegina, Runesocesius, Apollo, Bacchus, Ceres, Cupid, Diana, Janus, Jesus, Juno, Jupiter,
Maia, Mars, Mercury, Minerva, Neptune, Pluto, Plutus, Proserpina, Venus, Vesta, Vulcan, Attis, Cybele, El-Gabal, Isis, Mithras,
Sol Invictus, Endovelicus, Anubis, Aten, Atum, Bast, Bes, Geb, Hapi, Hathor, Heget, Horus, Imhotep, Isis, Khepry, Khnum,
Maahes, Ma’at, Menhit, Mont, Naunet, Neith, Nephthys, Nut, Osiris, Ptah, Ra, Sekhmnet, Sobek, Set, Tefnut, Thoth, An,
Anshar, Anu, Apsu, Ashur, Damkina, Ea, Enki, Enlil, Ereshkigal, Nunurta, Hadad, Inanna, Ishtar, Kingu, Kishar, Marduk,
Mummu, Nabu, Nammu, Nanna, Nergal, Ninhursag, Ninlil, Nintu, Shamash, Sin, Tiamat, Utu, Mitra, Amaterasu, Susanoo,
Tsukiyomi, Inari, Tengu, Izanami, Izanagi, Daikoku, Ebisu, Benzaiten, Bishamonten, Fukurokuju, Jurojin, Hotei, Quetzalcoatl,
Tlaloc, Inti, Kon, Mama Cocha, Mama Quilla, Manco Capac, Pachacamac and Zaramama.
m
We're not at all discussing what or which god etc. That would detract from my question.
(January 11, 2017 at 4:01 pm)Yadayadayada Wrote: Atheists, please define "evidence".
(January 12, 2017 at 9:20 am)Esquilax Wrote:(January 11, 2017 at 10:52 pm)Yadayadayada Wrote: Well, yes, this is what I am getting at.
You won't get CCTV footage or DNA samples as evidence of God. So, what would constitute enough "proof" or "evidence" for atheists to believe in God, or at least to consider God as the most credible explanation for the existence of the universe and life on earth?
So, you establish right off the bat that your god cannot clear an extremely low bar of evidence, the sort of evidence that a common flea could provide, yet the all powerful architect of the universe apparently can't. Having done that, you then proceed to question us, as though we're somehow obligated to accept some form of evidence below that low, low bar, what we'd need. What happens if the sort of evidence you'd excluded is the sort of evidence you'd need? Is that a problem for you?
As to your god? The biblical one? No, that god can't exist. It can't, because the evidence we already have contradicts the god described in the bible so thoroughly that there's really no way to salvage it. Not really our problem that your favorite explanation is an untenable idea, though.
I couldn't really find an answer in all of your drivel Esquilax. Again the question is: What do you consider evidence for the existence of God?