RE: Serious Problems with Atheism
January 18, 2017 at 8:48 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2017 at 8:50 pm by brewer.)
Nice cherry pick, one nut job.
Ok, tit for tat, Jim Jones. Not a war, just mad with christian religious power. Think he had a higher body count.
Or Marshall Applewhite. The next messiah, jesus 2.0.
Let's face it, more twisted deaths can be attributed to religious followings (not acting against, using) than atheist. Where did "kill them all and let god sort it out" come from?
And Dawkins, where/when did he say that? Are you taking things out of context (again) from River out of Eden, "The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference." He was not speaking about humans or human society. But I'm willing to let you take another swing at it and tell me where your Dawkins reference comes from.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins
BTW, Dawkins, not an apostle to me. But even if he was considered one, I as an atheist, am allowed to disagree. Something tells me that you are not allowed to disagree with the "true" apostles for fear of ever lasting punishment.
Ok, tit for tat, Jim Jones. Not a war, just mad with christian religious power. Think he had a higher body count.
Or Marshall Applewhite. The next messiah, jesus 2.0.
Let's face it, more twisted deaths can be attributed to religious followings (not acting against, using) than atheist. Where did "kill them all and let god sort it out" come from?
And Dawkins, where/when did he say that? Are you taking things out of context (again) from River out of Eden, "The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference." He was not speaking about humans or human society. But I'm willing to let you take another swing at it and tell me where your Dawkins reference comes from.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins
BTW, Dawkins, not an apostle to me. But even if he was considered one, I as an atheist, am allowed to disagree. Something tells me that you are not allowed to disagree with the "true" apostles for fear of ever lasting punishment.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.