RE: Reasoning showing that heterosexuality is evil
October 22, 2017 at 2:19 am
(This post was last modified: October 22, 2017 at 2:21 am by Edwardo Piet.)
(October 21, 2017 at 12:00 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: 1. The whole idea of sex having a purpose or any natural thing having a purpose stinks mightily of theism. The universe doesn’t have a purpose. It just is.
2. There are homosexuals that I know in real life and right here on this forum whom I love very much, so I’m not going to vindicate my heterosexuality by putting homosexuality down. Vice mother fucking versa, why try to vindicate homosexuality by putting heterosexuality down? If you’re secure in your sexuality, whatever it may be, you won’t have to do that.
. . . it's a parody thread.
Although I do actually agree with the arguments from my consequentialist perspective
But then again... my own personal tastes and urges are in direct conflict with my moral views anyways. I'm an anti-natalist but if I ever fell in love with a woman and we both wanted kids, I'd go for it anyway... because I'm selfish.
Likewise... even though my fertile self having sex with a fertile woman even with full protection still produces a chance of a baby and she may choose to not have an abortion . . . . and morally speaking I do think more people=worse for this planet . . . my desire and urge to get laid for purely selfish reasons is a lot stronger than my moral drive. This is why on CL's thread about asking if I was a moral person I did end up calling myself a good person because on balance I am. And I'm kind of a normal person. I'm certainly not a bad person. But amoral is really a better answer because I don't even follow my own moral values a lot of the time. But I'd say I'm a good person by most people's standards because my selfishness is purely normal and healthy. And I do avoid obvious moral evil which is all I think that is required.
