Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 26, 2024, 1:55 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Antisocial Asian says Hello
#21
RE: Antisocial Asian says Hello



I have to wonder what the reaction would be, if, in an intro thread, somebody posted, "Good, we need more Jews."


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#22
RE: Antisocial Asian says Hello
(October 28, 2012 at 6:26 am)apophenia Wrote:


I have to wonder what the reaction would be, if, in an intro thread, somebody posted, "Good. We need more Jews."



I didn't mean it in a bad way... I like having different peoples around, because that brings more perspective and more sophisticated discussions.

Jumping to conclusions, much?
Reply
#23
RE: Antisocial Asian says Hello
Well we could do with some more jews like the ones we already have.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#24
RE: Antisocial Asian says Hello
(October 28, 2012 at 6:28 am)Spectrum Wrote:
(October 28, 2012 at 6:26 am)apophenia Wrote: I have to wonder what the reaction would be, if, in an intro thread, somebody posted, "Good. We need more Jews."

I didn't mean it in a bad way... I like having different peoples around, because that brings more perspective and more sophisticated discussions.

Jumping to conclusions, much?

Since I said that I wondered what the reaction would be, instead of concluding what the reaction would be, the only person who appears to be jumping to conclusions here is you.

But then, having seen your flurry of attention whore threads over the past couple days, I'm hardly shocked.


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#25
RE: Antisocial Asian says Hello
(October 29, 2012 at 2:29 pm)apophenia Wrote: Since I said that I wondered what the reaction would be, instead of concluding what the reaction would be, the only person who appears to be jumping to conclusions here is you.

But then, having seen your flurry of attention whore threads over the past couple days, I'm hardly shocked.

No, you made that comment, because of my initial comment. The divergence and reference were obvious, so trying to play dumb now won't work. You were not simply wondering; you made a comment that had to do with me.

"Attention whoring"? Now who is jumping to conclusions (again!)? I'm just trying to start some discussions. There is no need to be overly sensitive.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Tongue A long-time lurker says hello Ludwig 22 3869 November 4, 2015 at 1:35 pm
Last Post: Ludwig
  Commie says hi! Red Economist 29 4050 August 8, 2015 at 1:55 am
Last Post: Lucanus
  AKD says hello Rational AKD 28 4078 October 7, 2013 at 9:54 pm
Last Post: Rational AKD
  Hey homeys, Mark Dreher says hello Mark Dreher 81 18766 August 21, 2013 at 3:41 am
Last Post: Darwinian
  2314th member says hi! THWOTH 31 8664 August 25, 2011 at 4:47 pm
Last Post: THWOTH
Thumbs Up Hello Hello loush 17 5990 December 13, 2010 at 2:53 pm
Last Post: theophilus
  Hello hello! DgyJff 8 3647 August 30, 2010 at 2:47 pm
Last Post: RachelSkates



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)