Muhammad the Greatest: A Comparative Study

[Al-Fatihah]

(9th December 2012 22:38)Stimbo Wrote:  Flange: You didn't answer the question so much as reword it. However, I think a clarification is in order. I didn't ask what evidence is, I asked you about the evidence you said was testable with regard to whatever truth might be determined from the teachings of Muhammad. Now don't get me wrong, I really don't care one whether you answer this point or not - it's merely that the people playing along at home are liable to think that the evidence you would have us believe is there actually might not be.

Response: Then if you don't care for an answer, then there is no need to entertain it with an answer.

[Dee Dee Ramone]

(9th December 2012 22:35)Al-Fatihah Wrote:  Response: Sorry, but you are the one claiming that Muhammad did not exist, so it is up to you to prove your claim. Otherwise, don't make the claim. As for Muhammad's existence, as I just demonstrated, you have no evidence as to who made up Muhammad and the circumstances behind it, which would logically be in existence if Muhammad was made up. It doesn't exist. Thus proving Muhammad existed.

In support of Al Fatihah's claim Muhammed, the greatest of greatest, is indeed the prophet, here is the ultimate proof.

---

---

Now I challenge the Atheists to dismiss this, who made it up huh? And when?

[Stimbo]

Bovril: Clearly there is no truth here, otherwise you wouldn't need to tapdance around.

This chewtoy seems to have lost all its flavour; can I have a new one, please?

[Gooders1002]

(9th December 2012 22:35)Al-Fatihah Wrote:  

(9th December 2012 22:27)Gooders1002 Wrote:  Sorry but you are the one claim his existence, it not up to me to disprove his existence, you have to prove he did, as you can't disprove a negative.
Show me what is the verified evidence (that been verified outside of Islam) of the existence of Mohammed. As if he did, there would be evidence. If I am wrong I will admit it, only if you provide the evidence.

Response: Sorry, but you are the one claiming that Muhammad did not exist, so it is up to you to prove your claim. Otherwise, don't make the claim. As for Muhammad's existence, as I just demonstrated, you have no evidence as to who made up Muhammad and the circumstances behind it, which would logically be in existence if Muhammad was made up. It doesn't exist. Thus proving Muhammad existed.

You're doing going a "you have to prove the nonexistence of Jesus". Islam claims Mohammad existed first so (correct me if I am wrong somebody else) the burden of proving lies on the person who originally makes the claim for the existence of something. For example If I make the claim for a flying pig in space, the burden of proof would be on me to prove its existence. You claim Mohammed existed, Prove it.

[Stimbo]

(9th December 2012 22:41)Dee Dee Ramone Wrote:  In support of Al Fatihah's claim Muhammed, the greatest of greatest, is indeed the prophet, here is the ultimate proof.

---

---

Now I challenge the Atheists to dismiss this, who made it up huh? And when?

I can dismiss it quite simply; that is not the greatest Muhammad. This one is:

---

---

We know this to be true because he said so himself.

[Darkstar]

(9th December 2012 18:24)Al-Fatihah Wrote:  Response:

A pedophile is one who has sex with children.

A child is one who has not reached puberty.

Muhammad had sex with someone who was mature and reached maturity.

Muhammad is not a pedophile.

A nine year old is not a child? Even cost cutters doesn't think that!
http://gocitykids.parentsconnect.com/att...T-59102-US

[Al-Fatihah]

(9th December 2012 22:47)Darkstar Wrote:  

(9th December 2012 18:24)Al-Fatihah Wrote:  Response:

A pedophile is one who has sex with children.

A child is one who has not reached puberty.

Muhammad had sex with someone who was mature and reached maturity.

Muhammad is not a pedophile.

A nine year old is not a child? Even cost cutters doesn't think that!
http://gocitykids.parentsconnect.com/att...T-59102-US

Response: When you can provide evidence of harm done in having consensul sex in marriage with a 9 year old who has reached maturity and and puberty, other than because mommy says so, then you will have a point.

[Dee Dee Ramone]

(9th December 2012 22:50)Al-Fatihah Wrote:  Response: When you can provide evidence of harm done in having consensul sex in marriage with a 9 year old who has reached maturity and and puberty, other than because mommy says so, then you will have a point.

Response: FUCK YOU.

[Al-Fatihah]

(9th December 2012 22:54)Dee Dee Ramone Wrote:  Response: FUCK YOU.

Response: Likewise.

[Gooders1002]

(9th December 2012 22:50)Al-Fatihah Wrote:  Response: When you can provide evidence of harm done in having consensul sex in marriage with a 9 year old who has reached maturity and and puberty, other than because mommy says so, then you will have a point.

That's low even by Islamic standards, words can not describe how fucked up and retarded that statement is. No wonder Islam is in a scientific Black hole when you say fucked up shit like that. I have no words that explain how I feel about the repulsiveness of your statement.