Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 2, 2024, 1:01 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Conflicting statements in the bible
RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
(May 24, 2013 at 3:15 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:
(May 24, 2013 at 2:29 pm)Ryantology Wrote: Then, why does God's behavior, in scripture, fall short of even the lowest standard to which I would hold any human being?
This is your judgement based on the literal interpretation of Scriptures to which you cling. And you refuse to question this fundamentalist mindset because without it you could not justify your anti-religious bigotry.

Who's fault is it that your scripture has to be so liberally-interpreted so as not to sound like an instruction manual for psychopaths? I didn't write the thing, and I have no interest in trying to explain how, when God is frothing at the mouth at his assembly of marauding killers to go through a town and slaughter women and children for the crime of living in a place where a few people pissed God off for some completely arbitrary reason, that it's actually an expression of God's justice and mercy and love. I value my brain cells too highly for that.
Reply
RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
(May 23, 2013 at 10:25 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:
(May 23, 2013 at 7:06 pm)whateverist Wrote: ...the new pope has declared that we are all saved by the sacrifice of that guy, what's his name .. oh yeah, Jesus. Atheists too. Good works are now officially enough.
The Whore of Babylon never ceases to arrogate the authority of God to itself. =-0

you honestly believe that Christ would reject a person because he does not believe in him?

In that whore lies a child wrapped in the evils of this world. "Christ" can see through this flesh and touch that child.

that "child" is you ya know.
Reply
RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
Quote:Comparisons of versions show that no changes affecting significant doctrines have been introduced.

Totally false, laddie. Read "Jesus Interrupted" by Bart Ehrman and learn how badly you have been conned.
Reply
RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
(May 22, 2013 at 2:24 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: No pretending required, Joseph Stalin is receiving justice as we speak for murdering 50 million of his fellow countryman. If God didn’t exist then he got off Scot free and died one of the most powerful men in the World. I take comfort in knowing justice was served.

This reveals much about your motivation for your belief.
You have an infantile need for justice after death.
Joseph Stalin did "get away" with his crimes as did Jimmy Saville.
It perhaps was not justice but is the truth.
Now grow a pair and suck it up.

Quote:You’re usually a bit more eloquent than this FNM. No, it God didn’t exist neither of us would be here right now.

You do know that we don't believe in your god because it is a stupid idea do you not?

Quote:No, God’s upholding grace prevents all of us from being as evil as we could be, we do not deserve any credit for not committing such evil acts. How are you defining “right” here?

What sort of monster are you that the only thing stopping you from rampaging through your town is your belief in a magic man?

I don't go around doing evil because I am a nice person.

(May 22, 2013 at 8:53 am)Faith No More Wrote: I just get frustrated hearing all of this "as an atheist you can't prove something is immoral" crap, as if it is impossible to determine what you should and sh

Quote:There’s no need to get frustrated, if you believe my statement is wrong then just prove it. Provide a logically sound syllogism that proves child molestation would be wrong independent of time and place in a Universe devoid of God’s existence. If it’s sound I’ll admit I was wrong. Smile

Because I have empathy I can put myself in the position of the child and think "I would not like to be treated like that".
Also mistreating a child would often have consequences if other members of society found out, particularly the parents

I really do not see a need for a deity of any kind to account for morals.

Quote:the following characteristics are shared by humans and other social animals, particularly the great apes:
attachment and bonding, cooperation and mutual aid, sympathy and empathy, direct and indirect reciprocity, altruism and reciprocal altruism, conflict resolution and peacemaking, deception and deception detection, community concern and caring about what others think about you, and awareness of and response to the social rules of the group

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_morality

Again I break out this old doozy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyd6om8IC4M



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
"Crimes against an infinite authority necessitate an infinite punishment, makes sense. "

Sure, Stat, that would make sense if you were a despot interested in the relative measure of your authority over the relative weight of the actual crime committed when doling out punishment. So, say, stealing from a tyrant should require more punishment than stealing from a beggar. After all, the tyrant has more authority. Jerkoff

Round these parts, we punish according to the weight -of the crime-...not the weight of -the body doling out punitive measures-. If we did it the way that "makes sense", to you, every crime would have precisely the same punitive actions associated, as the weight of the authority doling out those actions is unchanged between any two entirely disparate crimes.

What a joke.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
(May 23, 2013 at 7:06 pm)whateverist Wrote: Also, did you hear that the new pope has declared that we are all saved by the sacrifice of that guy, what's his name .. oh yeah, Jesus. Atheists too. Good works are now officially enough. So if that was all that was holding you back from joining we godless, you need no longer worry.

How is this relevant to a Reformed Christian?
Smile
(May 24, 2013 at 12:40 pm)Sal Wrote: It's origins were between Socrates and Euthyphro discussing moral actions, but it has been a stop-gap for monotheistic religions as well ever since it was first worded with plenty of hand waves against it, From Socrates to Thomas Aquinas to William James. No theologian has been able to explain it away without a considerable effort of edifying their terms upon how they view their particular version of god.

No, it doesn’t apply to any God whose actions consistently derive from His character, God’s actions are Holy because they derive from His Holy character which is the ultimate standard of Holiness. The dilemma only applies in a polytheistic system where you have no ultimate authority or god.

Quote:"Is what is morally good commanded by God because it is morally good, or is it morally good because it is commanded by God?"

Neither, it’s a false dilemma. God’s commandments are morally good because they consistently derive from His morally good character.

Quote: But really, all this hand-waving really accounts for is that people have decided beforehand what is moral and what isn't before even hearing of Euthyphro dilemma, which only elicits rationalizations by theists.

Have you given up trying to formulate a reason as to why pedophilia is morally wrong if God doesn’t exist?

(May 28, 2013 at 11:59 am)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:Comparisons of versions show that no changes affecting significant doctrines have been introduced.

Totally false, laddie. Read "Jesus Interrupted" by Bart Ehrman and learn how badly you have been conned.

Or better yet he could watch Daniel Wallace destroy Bart Ehrman in debate and hold to his original position.

“Thank you Miles for organizing this event, and for flying in Dan Wallace to beat my rear side all over the stage.” – Bart Ehrman

(May 28, 2013 at 12:35 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: This reveals much about your motivation for your belief.

No it doesn’t.

Quote: You have an infantile need for justice after death.

As do you.

Quote: Joseph Stalin did "get away" with his crimes as did Jimmy Saville.
How do you know this?

Quote:You do know that we don't believe in your god because it is a stupid idea do you not?

What you may or may not think is stupid is irrelevant to what is and is not real.

Quote:What sort of monster are you that the only thing stopping you from rampaging through your town is your belief in a magic man?

Where did I say that? God’s grace is the only thing that prevents either of us from being as evil as we could be.

Quote: I don't go around doing evil because I am a nice person.

No, God prevents you from doing evil.

Quote:
Because I have empathy I can put myself in the position of the child and think "I would not like to be treated like that".

So? Why is it morally wrong to treat someone unlike you’d want to be treated if God doesn’t exist?

Quote: Also mistreating a child would often have consequences if other members of society found out, particularly the parents

That’s a fallacious appeal to force; something is only wrong because other people might do bad things to you if you choose to do that thing? So saving Jews from the Gestapo in Nazi Germany was morally wrong because the Gestapo would have killed you for doing it if they caught you?

Quote: I really do not see a need for a deity of any kind to account for morals.

I see the need.

Quote:


Is your argument really going to be that simply because the Great Apes do something it is morally right for Humans to do the same? Apes kill one another and rape one another; is murder and rape therefore morally good for Humans? Not only this, but how are you valid in reasoning from the way things are to the way things ought to be?

(May 28, 2013 at 12:39 pm)Rhythm Wrote:


This fails for two reasons…Smile

1. Simply because we do something a particular way in this country does not mean that is the just way of doing something.
2. Even if that were the case, we do punish according to authority in the United States. If you assault a homeless man you’re going to receive a lot less time behind bars than if you assaulted the President of the United States. Shoot a gang member and you’ll receive a lot less time behind bars than if you shot a Police Officer. Crimes against an infinite authority under this same system would necessitate a punishment of infinite duration.
Reply
RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
(May 28, 2013 at 5:10 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Have you given up trying to formulate a reason as to why pedophilia is morally wrong if God doesn’t exist?

In a world where morals are societally derived (like ours), pedophilia does not promote social and personal well-being. No god required.

In islam, pedophilia is not a problem because they have a different SOCIETALLY based moral code than we do. Again, no god required.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." -Einstein
Reply
RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
(May 28, 2013 at 5:16 pm)Baalzebutt Wrote: In islam, pedophilia is not a problem because they have a different SOCIETALLY based moral code than we do. Again, no god required.
I don't know where the hell you got that idea from, this is a case of culture 'dictating' Islamic law, not the other way around.
Reply
RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
(May 28, 2013 at 5:16 pm)Baalzebutt Wrote: In a world where morals are societally derived (like ours), pedophilia does not promote social and personal well-being. No god required.

Is it always morally wrong to violate the moral laws derived by the particular society a person lives in? Is it therefore not morally wrong for members from one society to murder and rape the members of another society?

Quote: In islam, pedophilia is not a problem because they have a different SOCIETALLY based moral code than we do. Again, no god required.

So homosexuality is morally wrong in the Middle East and they are morally justified in stoning homosexuals?
Reply
RE: Conflicting statements in the bible
(May 28, 2013 at 5:24 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: So homosexuality is morally wrong in the Middle East and they are morally justified in stoning homosexuals?
Where do they stone homosexuals in the Middle East? I've been there and I have no idea what you're talking about.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Satanic Bible vs Christian Bible ƵenKlassen 31 7771 November 27, 2017 at 10:38 am
Last Post: drfuzzy
  Religion conflicting with science Bad Wolf 30 10522 October 15, 2013 at 11:35 pm
Last Post: ThomM
  Useless / Unhelpful statements religious people make Free Thinker 30 9122 April 24, 2013 at 3:02 pm
Last Post: Darkstar



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)