Login

~~EgoRaptor~~ · February 18, 2014 at 5:05 pm

(February 18, 2014 at 4:42 pm)paulpablo Wrote:
(February 18, 2014 at 3:49 pm)KUSA Wrote: There is one other thing to consider. The child would be yours and the fucktard that set this up would have possession of your child. That would be unacceptable to me.

That's a good point who would have possession of the child?

The psycho would. Who knows what he wants to do with it.

Tonus · (This post was last modified: February 18, 2014 at 5:11 pm by Tonus.)

CD's response seems the most rational to me. The simplest way to look at it is, what action am I taking? I am either directly hurting a person or I am not. It is only my choice to harm the young girl in the room with me, NOT the loved one who is at the mercy of the villain. It is in fact his choice to harm my loved one if I refuse to harm the girl. In that case the choice is easy; I would not rape the young girl. Were our positions reversed, I can imagine that I would be extremely disturbed at the thought that someone violated a child just to spare me from torture.

Or to put it another way, what if you were on that end of it and afterwards you had to face that child and explain why it was better you than him/her?

**Jackalope** · February 18, 2014 at 5:40 pm

(February 18, 2014 at 5:10 pm)Tonus Wrote: CD's response seems the most rational to me. The simplest way to look at it is, what action am I taking? I am either directly hurting a person or I am not. It is only my choice to harm the young girl in the room with me, NOT the loved one who is at the mercy of the villain. It is in fact his choice to harm my loved one if I refuse to harm the girl. In that case the choice is easy; I would not rape the young girl. Were our positions reversed, I can imagine that I would be extremely disturbed at the thought that someone violated a child just to spare me from torture.

Not only that, but by raping and impregnating the child, you are now directly responsible for putting an infant (YOUR child) into the hands of a psychopath.

Saving your loved one is the most selfish, least moral choice.

Chad32 · February 18, 2014 at 5:47 pm

(February 18, 2014 at 5:40 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
(February 18, 2014 at 5:10 pm)Tonus Wrote: CD's response seems the most rational to me. The simplest way to look at it is, what action am I taking? I am either directly hurting a person or I am not. It is only my choice to harm the young girl in the room with me, NOT the loved one who is at the mercy of the villain. It is in fact his choice to harm my loved one if I refuse to harm the girl. In that case the choice is easy; I would not rape the young girl. Were our positions reversed, I can imagine that I would be extremely disturbed at the thought that someone violated a child just to spare me from torture.

Not only that, but by raping and impregnating the child, you are now directly responsible for putting an infant (YOUR child) into the hands of a psychopath.

Saving your loved one is the most selfish, least moral choice.

Assuming he was going to let us go, we'd do what we could to rescue the girl and kid. I'm not sure what the point is with the emphasis of it being your kid, though. Yes you're the dad, but it's with a stranger and there's no real planning or bonding or anything. It's like if I donated sperm and found out some stranger had a kid with my sperm. It's not like I'd be asking for visitation rights or anything.

**Jackalope** · February 18, 2014 at 5:52 pm

(February 18, 2014 at 5:47 pm)Chad32 Wrote: Assuming he was going to let us go,

Why would you assume that? It's not stated as a condition of the dilemma, and I certainly wouldn't assume that a psychopath would do such a thing.

Chad32 · February 18, 2014 at 5:59 pm

(February 18, 2014 at 5:52 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
(February 18, 2014 at 5:47 pm)Chad32 Wrote: Assuming he was going to let us go,

Why would you assume that? It's not stated as a condition of the dilemma, and I certainly wouldn't assume that a psychopath would do such a thing.

It's just a vague dilemma where you're forced to do one thing or another. There aren't really any details besides that. I just think that having sex with someone is better than sitting in a room hearing my loved one get tortured.

**Jackalope** · February 18, 2014 at 6:06 pm

(February 18, 2014 at 5:59 pm)Chad32 Wrote:
(February 18, 2014 at 5:52 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Why would you assume that? It's not stated as a condition of the dilemma, and I certainly wouldn't assume that a psychopath would do such a thing.

It's just a vague dilemma where you're forced to do one thing or another. There aren't really any details besides that. I just think that having sex with someone is better than sitting in a room hearing my loved one get tortured.

if the consequences were limited to just having sex with someone, I would agree with you 100%.

Violet · February 18, 2014 at 6:09 pm

Fighting the will of one's captors, when one has no possibility of escape, or is otherwise coerced... is not wise.

Not that I wouldn't do my very best to have the 14 year old creature enjoy themselves Sleepy

~~EgoRaptor~~ · February 18, 2014 at 6:13 pm

(February 18, 2014 at 5:40 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
(February 18, 2014 at 5:10 pm)Tonus Wrote: CD's response seems the most rational to me. The simplest way to look at it is, what action am I taking? I am either directly hurting a person or I am not. It is only my choice to harm the young girl in the room with me, NOT the loved one who is at the mercy of the villain. It is in fact his choice to harm my loved one if I refuse to harm the girl. In that case the choice is easy; I would not rape the young girl. Were our positions reversed, I can imagine that I would be extremely disturbed at the thought that someone violated a child just to spare me from torture.

Not only that, but by raping and impregnating the child, you are now directly responsible for putting an infant (YOUR child) into the hands of a psychopath.

Saving your loved one is the most selfish, least moral choice.

I believe it is moral to be selfish & put one's loved one & self first.

Violet · (This post was last modified: February 18, 2014 at 6:25 pm by Violet.)

(February 17, 2014 at 7:55 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: The person I love most in the world would endure fiendish torture to prevent my becoming a party to rape.

Boru

And if I was the one holding them captive... would you allow the psychological death of your loved one by my hand? Levitate

It is not a question of whether they are willing to sacrifice for you... it is a question of whether you will let them be sacrificed for sake of your pathetic nobility.

(February 17, 2014 at 8:09 pm)Chad32 Wrote: I assume you're not given time to convince the girl to consent? Though even then, it would still be statutory rape. It seems like a weird question. If he's crazy enough to do this, he's crazy enough to rape her himself.

Where would the fun in that be? I raise you: it is far more thrilling to see them squirm.

(February 17, 2014 at 8:13 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote: No he wants the child. And he wants you to be the father.

Ooh... dark~.

Quote:Also the girl is dead set on saving herself, you cannot convince her to give in.

Infact, making her enjoy this situation would probably only make it hurt more in the end. (shame)

The 'kinder' thing to do is to hurt her. Being kind is not always an easy thing.

(February 17, 2014 at 9:01 pm)bennyboy Wrote: The girl's trauma may be temporary. She may adapt to it, and may realize some day that it was necessary. My loved one's death will not be temporary, and my loved one will not have any chance to adapt to it. I'd therefore do oit.

There are a lot of 'mays' present here.

Quote:Now, if you turn it around and make it a 14 year-old loved one (a daughter or niece or something), and a stranger being saved, things would appear very different to me.

I hope this 'rich bastard' gives you a perfect view of the pain this stranger is feeling. We wouldn't want you to enjoy yourself too much.

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me

Poll: What Would You Do? This poll is closed.
Rape the Girl	90.00%	9	90.00%
Let the Person You Love be Tortured	10.00%	1	10.00%
Total		10 vote(s)	100%

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Maximizing Moral Virtue	h311inac311	191	13439	December 17, 2022 at 10:36 pm Last Post: Objectivist
	As a nonreligious person, where do you get your moral guidance?	Gentle_Idiot	79	6789	November 26, 2022 at 10:27 pm Last Post: The Grand Nudger
	Moral justification for the execution of criminals of war?	Macoleco	184	6773	August 19, 2022 at 7:03 pm Last Post: bennyboy
	On theism, why do humans have moral duties even if there are objective moral values?	Pnerd	37	3171	May 24, 2022 at 11:49 am Last Post: The Grand Nudger
	Can we trust our Moral Intuitions?	vulcanlogician	72	3877	November 7, 2021 at 1:25 pm Last Post: Alan V
	Any Moral Relativists in the House?	vulcanlogician	72	4774	June 21, 2021 at 9:09 am Last Post: vulcanlogician
	[Serious] Moral Obligations toward Possible Worlds	Neo-Scholastic	93	5807	May 23, 2021 at 1:43 am Last Post: Anomalocaris
	A Moral Reality	Acrobat	29	3238	September 12, 2019 at 8:09 pm Last Post: brewer
	In Defense of a Non-Natural Moral Order	Acrobat	84	7196	August 30, 2019 at 3:02 pm Last Post: LastPoet
	Moral Oughts	Acrobat	109	7771	August 30, 2019 at 4:24 am Last Post: Acrobat