Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 2:38 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
#21
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
We are fucked because we decided to walk upright. That messed up the whole topology.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#22
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
Is that for realsies?

I have often wondered the same thing, about childbirth being so ridiculous for humans.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#23
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
It wasn't dangerous enough to kill enough of us off. I imagine anytime it was dangerous enough to kill off the individual....they died. Having a big brain and narrower bipedal hips kept proving beneficial for reproduction. It couldn't care less about our comfort.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:

"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."

For context, this is the previous verse:

"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
Reply
#24
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 28, 2015 at 10:58 am)pocaracas Wrote:
(April 28, 2015 at 10:57 am)Pyrrho Wrote: Genesis 3:

16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

Damn.... I gotta show this to my bossy catholic wife!

There are quite a few Bible verses that denigrate women.  Here is a link to a list, though I warn you to double check every reference, as the person who compiled the list tends to go overboard sometimes:

http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/women/long.html

But make sure you look at things carefully, as you would not want to miss out on Matthew 19:29 (and Mark 10:29-30 and Luke 18:29-30), where Jesus states that it is good to abandon your wife and children to follow Jesus; 1 Corinthians 11:3 tells you that a man is head of the woman (you might want to make sure you read the whole chapter 11, to get the full feel of women's place); 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, where it states that women should be silent in church, and if they have any questions, they can ask their husbands later on; Ephesians 5:2-24, where it states that women should obey their husbands in all things, as if their husbands were Christ (!); Ephesians 5:33, where it states that wives should have reverence for their husbands; Colossians 3:18, where wives should submit to their husbands; 1 Timothy 2:11-12, where women should learn in silence from men, and not usurp authority over men; and etc.  There are more verses that say that wives should obey their husbands; look carefully at the references at the link above, and make sure you compare in a Catholic-approved Bible for your case.  You should have the idea by now; if your wife is a bossy Catholic, she is not following the teachings of the Bible, as, according to the Bible, she should obey you as if you were Christ himself.

"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Reply
#25
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
I wonder if mortality rates have got lower though, bad as they are now. If a woman dies, she can't have any more kids... so I would have thought the longer a woman can have kids before dying, the more her genes would get passed on.

That's based on literally nothing, but it makes sense to my addled brain.

Obviously I'm talking long term here.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#26
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 28, 2015 at 10:04 am)Alex K Wrote:
(April 28, 2015 at 9:58 am)pocaracas Wrote: If our eye is so perfect, then why make an even better one and give it to eagles?

Original sin. Before the fall, our eyes were perfect.

[Image: c21ecebc560514fe3e48ca5eef1c09b8.jpg]
John Adams Wrote:The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
Reply
#27
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 28, 2015 at 12:08 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:
(April 28, 2015 at 10:58 am)pocaracas Wrote: Damn.... I gotta show this to my bossy catholic wife!

There are quite a few Bible verses that denigrate women.  Here is a link to a list, though I warn you to double check every reference, as the person who compiled the list tends to go overboard sometimes:

http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/women/long.html

But make sure you look at things carefully, as you would not want to miss out on Matthew 19:29 (and Mark 10:29-30 and Luke 18:29-30), where Jesus states that it is good to abandon your wife and children to follow Jesus; 1 Corinthians 11:3 tells you that a man is head of the woman (you might want to make sure you read the whole chapter 11, to get the full feel of women's place); 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, where it states that women should be silent in church, and if they have any questions, they can ask their husbands later on; Ephesians 5:2-24, where it states that women should obey their husbands in all things, as if their husbands were Christ (!); Ephesians 5:33, where it states that wives should have reverence for their husbands; Colossians 3:18, where wives should submit to their husbands; 1 Timothy 2:11-12, where women should learn in silence from men, and not usurp authority over men; and etc.  There are more verses that say that wives should obey their husbands; look carefully at the references at the link above, and make sure you compare in a Catholic-approved Bible for your case.  You should have the idea by now; if your wife is a bossy Catholic, she is not following the teachings of the Bible, as, according to the Bible, she should obey you as if you were Christ himself.

Oh, boy... am I gonna get a beating.... Cool
Reply
#28
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
(April 28, 2015 at 12:13 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Oh, boy... am I gonna get a beating.... Cool

Then u r doing patriarchy rong

(April 28, 2015 at 12:06 pm)robvalue Wrote: Is that for realsies?

I have often wondered the same thing, about childbirth being so ridiculous for humans.

http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/print/...erman-text

Quote: A hundred years ago, childbirth was a leading cause of death for women of childbearing age.

Why do we possess a birth canal of such Byzantine design? "The human female pelvis is a classic example of evolutionary compromise," Rosenberg answers. Its design reflects a trade-off between the demand for a skeletal structure that allows for habitual walking on two feet and one that permits the passage of a baby with a big brain and wide shoulders. Its unique features didn't come about all at once, but at different times in our evolutionary history, in response to different selective pressures. "The result of these different pressures is a jerry-rigged, unsatisfactory structure," Rosenberg says. "It works, but only marginally. It's definitely not the type of system you would invent if you were designing it. But evolution is clearly a tinkerer, not an engineer; it has to work with yesterday's model."
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#29
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
Cool, thanks Smile
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#30
RE: The Human Eye: A Double Standard?
@Lek

This is why:

Quote:[evolution] has to work with yesterday's model

You have to look a bit closer at how evolution by natural selection works. It's not planning ahead and most of the time only finds a compromise with what is there, and what new small variation can be produced to adapt to circumstances.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  New Revised Standard Version Bible has Dead Sea Scroll input ?!?! vorlon13 17 3865 February 20, 2017 at 5:16 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Shouldn't there be more Christians with eye patches? BrokenQuill92 33 7881 February 2, 2014 at 9:57 am
Last Post: Tonus
  Tired of xtians prattling on about their "eye-witness" testimony? Minimalist 22 10155 April 27, 2012 at 1:21 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Is God’s justice close to an eye for an eye? Greatest I am 14 7869 January 15, 2012 at 10:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  God did it! Statistical miracle! 6 double-yolk eggs in a row. (not a miracle, BBC) Anymouse 1 2064 December 10, 2011 at 3:10 am
Last Post: TheDarkestOfAngels



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)