Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 28, 2024, 10:20 am

Poll: ...
This poll is closed.
Yes (please explain)
13.64%
3 13.64%
No (please explain)
31.82%
7 31.82%
Other (you guessed it, please explain lol)
54.55%
12 54.55%
Total 22 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Your views on MARRIAGE
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
(July 10, 2015 at 2:28 pm)Dystopia Wrote: I do agree as a general rule at least because two parents provide more financial support and generally because both parents work it's possible to always have someone taking care of the kid as long as you schedule things correctly. I don't have anything against single parenting though, I was raised from age 11 just with my mom, and yeah it was a lot thougher than before, but I survived.

Haha, thanks for finally being someone who agrees on something that seems pretty basic to me!

And of course, I agree with what you said about not having anything against single parents.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
I don't think the current 'family' concepts are any good.
I don't think we should have as many kids, anyway.
I think society should become more rational so as to be able to coexist rationally. Then, I'm sure, there won't be any need for any "families". People would find a better way to nurture their young than just giving them up to the "natural parents", as there would be no reason to do so. Also, I assume that we'll be able to reproduce artificially in the future, so there won't be any need at all for any kind of this nonsense. And another thing: if we'll manage do extend our life spans indefinitely, somehow, then we would just stop having kids altogether, as it would just become catastrophic to continue having kids in such an environment. That is, until we would figure out how to reach other viable planets, or Terraform Mars, and colonize them, or something like that.
Reply
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
I missed my dad because of the financial support it provided me - Child alimony was not the same as having the full salary available - I went trough some rough times, it was just me, my mom and my sister. Of course, some single parents can provide a lot of stability, financial support and love, but it's always easier if you have two people doing the work - And I say two people because normally these are the biological parents.

A hard question:

Essentially, when you get married (just two people) you can have kids if it's a heterosexual couple, and then the law provides all the authority, rights and duties you have with your children, not to mention you have full legal supervision until they are 18 years old (and in some States 21) - Part of this stems from the fact the parents are biological - Legally, there is a preference given to biological parents, and withing marriage both have equal rights and duties for their children - But, but... Let's imagine a less complicated scenario and say there are just three people getting married, that's cool - Two of them are of the opposite sex and have a kid, so the kid is born and obviously the law operates automatic custody and all the legal rights and duties between parents and children - What about the other person? I mean, in marriage you're not supposed to discriminate against people, and as a general rule if you get married and have kids both have equal rights, so how do we deal with this? can we violate the principle that both parties are equal? Because the custody and rights comes from the fact the child is biologically yours - Adopted children, in any legal system in the west, are not treated the same as biological ones, even in cases where parents totally suck, the rights of the tutor are never exactly as wide as of a biological parent, so how can we justify that one of the parties in the contract has less rights?
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you

Reply
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
(July 10, 2015 at 2:41 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: I don't think the current 'family' concepts are any good.
I don't think we should have as many kids, anyway.
I think society should become more rational so as to be able to coexist rationally. Then, I'm sure, there won't be any need for any "families". People would find a better way to nurture their young than just giving them up to the "natural parents", as there would be no reason to do so. Also, I assume that we'll be able to reproduce artificially in the future, so there won't be any need at all for any kind of this nonsense. And another thing: if we'll manage do extend our life spans indefinitely, somehow, then we would just stop having kids altogether, as it would just become catastrophic to continue having kids in such an environment. That is, until we would figure out how to reach other viable planets, or Terraform Mars, and colonize them, or something like that.

What you think is not really relevant if you don't present an objectively valid reason for it.
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you

Reply
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
(July 10, 2015 at 2:44 pm)Dystopia Wrote:
(July 10, 2015 at 2:41 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: I don't think the current 'family' concepts are any good.
I don't think we should have as many kids, anyway.
I think society should become more rational so as to be able to coexist rationally. Then, I'm sure, there won't be any need for any "families". People would find a better way to nurture their young than just giving them up to the "natural parents", as there would be no reason to do so. Also, I assume that we'll be able to reproduce artificially in the future, so there won't be any need at all for any kind of this nonsense. And another thing: if we'll manage do extend our life spans indefinitely, somehow, then we would just stop having kids altogether, as it would just become catastrophic to continue having kids in such an environment. That is, until we would figure out how to reach other viable planets, or Terraform Mars, and colonize them, or something like that.

What you think is not really relevant if you don't present an objectively valid reason for it.

What's your fucking problem, idiot?
Reply
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
(July 10, 2015 at 2:44 pm)Dystopia Wrote:
(July 10, 2015 at 2:41 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: I don't think the current 'family' concepts are any good.
I don't think we should have as many kids, anyway.
I think society should become more rational so as to be able to coexist rationally. Then, I'm sure, there won't be any need for any "families". People would find a better way to nurture their young than just giving them up to the "natural parents", as there would be no reason to do so. Also, I assume that we'll be able to reproduce artificially in the future, so there won't be any need at all for any kind of this nonsense. And another thing: if we'll manage do extend our life spans indefinitely, somehow, then we would just stop having kids altogether, as it would just become catastrophic to continue having kids in such an environment. That is, until we would figure out how to reach other viable planets, or Terraform Mars, and colonize them, or something like that.

What you think is not really relevant if you don't present an objectively valid reason for it.

agreed.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
(July 10, 2015 at 2:46 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(July 10, 2015 at 2:44 pm)Dystopia Wrote: What you think is not really relevant if you don't present an objectively valid reason for it.

agreed.

Get the fuck out of here, you crazy bitch. You asked me forty times already what do I think about this and now my opinion is not relevant? What the actual fuck?!
What is this? I am not allowed to state my opinions all of a sudden?

I might be a bit cranky but this is just outrageous. Gtfo. If you don't consider people's opinions relevant than don't force them out of them for halves of hours at a time.
Reply
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
(July 10, 2015 at 2:41 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: I don't think the current 'family' concepts are any good.
I don't think we should have as many kids, anyway.
I think society should become more rational so as to be able to coexist rationally. Then, I'm sure, there won't be any need for any "families". People would find a better way to nurture their young than just giving them up to the "natural parents", as there would be no reason to do so. Also, I assume that we'll be able to reproduce artificially in the future, so there won't be any need at all for any kind of this nonsense. And another thing: if we'll manage do extend our life spans indefinitely, somehow, then we would just stop having kids altogether, as it would just become catastrophic to continue having kids in such an environment. That is, until we would figure out how to reach other viable planets, or Terraform Mars, and colonize them, or something like that.

Can you answer my questions directly from my post #142? Thanks! :Smile

(or if you'd like I can make another post asking for clarifications again, but I think if you just answered the one I already made clearly and directly it would be quicker and more efficient.)

(July 10, 2015 at 2:48 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote:
(July 10, 2015 at 2:46 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: agreed.

Get the fuck out of here, you crazy bitch. You asked me forty times already what do I think about this and now my opinion is not relevant? What the actual fuck?!
What is this? I am not allowed to state my opinions all of a sudden?

I am sorry you're so upset, and sincerely apologize for having upset you.

I asked you direct questions in my post 142, and I feel as though, instead of answering them, you just repeated what you had already said. If you want me to fully understand where you are coming from, can you directly address my questions? I am still in need those answers in order to better understand your views.

However, if you do not want me to understand and do not want to have this discussion with me, I will respect your wishes and drop the subject. Thank you.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
(July 10, 2015 at 2:46 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote:
(July 10, 2015 at 2:44 pm)Dystopia Wrote: What you think is not really relevant if you don't present an objectively valid reason for it.

What's your fucking problem, idiot?

Go fuck yourself cunt.
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you

Reply
RE: Your views on MARRIAGE
(July 10, 2015 at 2:49 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Can you answer my questions directly from my post #142? Thanks! :Smile

(or if you'd like I can make another post asking for clarifications again, but I think if you just answered the one I already made clearly and directly it would be quicker and more efficient.)

I did answer your questions. At least I thought I did.
Questions from said post were not clear. Please ask again anything you want, and I'll answer. You better not blow me off again like that, though. That's rude and uncalled for. Especially if you're expressively asking for my opinion beforehand.

(July 10, 2015 at 2:54 pm)Dystopia Wrote:
(July 10, 2015 at 2:46 pm)excitedpenguin Wrote: What's your fucking problem, idiot?

Go fuck yourself cunt.

I don't get it. Was I even talking to you at all? Why did you feel the need to butt in like that? And if you do disagree with me, provide reasons as to why, don't just try shutting me up just because my opinions don't fit with your particular worldview.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why don't Southern states outlaw interracial marriage? Jehanne 12 1196 July 26, 2022 at 7:55 am
Last Post: h4ym4n
  Transgenderism versus Interracial Marriage. Jehanne 3 558 April 18, 2021 at 1:09 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Russia's Putin wants traditional marriage and God in constitution zebo-the-fat 17 1686 March 4, 2020 at 7:44 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Elizabeth Warren On Marriage Equality BrianSoddingBoru4 8 1582 October 15, 2019 at 11:47 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Would You Boycott a Business Because of the Owner's Political Views? Seraphina 70 10011 January 28, 2017 at 3:42 pm
Last Post: ComradeMeow
  Trump Says His Views on Gays are "Evolving" Rhondazvous 19 2213 April 5, 2016 at 9:37 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Atheists, do you support same-sex marriage? TristanTeller 72 16186 July 31, 2015 at 7:37 pm
Last Post: Cato
  What are your political views? Catholic_Lady 57 13276 July 18, 2015 at 8:54 am
Last Post: Dystopia
  Views on the Death Penalty? (a poll) Catholic_Lady 171 24193 July 9, 2015 at 10:20 am
Last Post: Catholic_Lady
  GOP to unveil bill to stop affirmation of same-sex marriage Foxaèr 10 3245 April 23, 2015 at 11:57 am
Last Post: Pyrrho



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)