Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 10, 2024, 3:18 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
why
ProgrammingGod doesn't understand how font size and eyeballs work.
If water rots the soles of your boots, what does it do to your intestines?
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
Well, I tried to understand what was being postulated. All that happened is now I think Cortana is trying to kill me. I used to run my neck on religiousforums and these Buddhist muppets would twist themselves into pretzels in attempting to communicate without the use of the word I. That's the vibe I'm getting here. :/

404 evidence of evidence not found.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 19, 2016 at 2:02 pm)houseofcantor Wrote: Well, I tried to understand what was being postulated. All that happened is now I think Cortana is trying to kill me. I used to run my neck on religiousforums and these Buddhist muppets would twist themselves into pretzels in attempting to communicate without the use of the word I. That's the vibe I'm getting here. :/

404 evidence of evidence not found.

('A')


I had tweeted to Sam Harris (an atheist physicist), notifying him of my ATHEISTIC nature, WHILST stipulating of his closed mindedness (I had used expletives) - in NOT recognizing the likely hood of non-omniscient Gods, (on scientific observation).

A few weeks after said tweet, Sam conceded, of the serious possibility, that mankind shall likely compose a type of 'God' in this video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nt3edWL...tml5=False

SEE video section "14:08".


('B')


I have not any certainty, whether I had influenced his video, but I had tweeted him the article stipulated in the original post.
Here is the article once more:
https://medium.com/@uni.omniscient.x/god....gew83ll3i



('C')

Albeit, not all beings are as reasonable as Sam Harris, or other physicists/scientists, which is quite disappointing.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
This thread is bullshit without crayon drawings. I want my crayon drawings!
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
Hehehe

ProgrammingGodJordan just got banned on The Thinking Atheist. He posted the same OP there and it was pointed out quite how it had already turned out on AF. They obviously recognised that he lacked any entertainment value as a chew toy, would not respond to any questions and just kept spamming the same shit again and again.

His thread made 3 pages before he got banned.

http://www.thethinkingatheist.com/forum/...ype-of-God
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
He's not a physicist. The likelihood that that happened is the same as you being an A. I. created by dogs.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 20, 2016 at 2:56 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: I had tweeted to Sam Harris (an atheist physicist), notifying him of my ATHEISTIC nature, WHILST stipulating of his closed mindedness (I had used expletives)

ROFLOL
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 20, 2016 at 7:52 am)Excited Penguin Wrote: He's not a physicist. The likelihood that that happened is the same as you being an A. I. created by dogs.

(A)

Indeed, a typographical error of mine.

Sam is but a neuroscientist.

I had been observing a debate, between William Lane Craig and Sean Caroll, a physicist.
I am reminded of Sam Harris, in observing Sean Caroll.

Therein the typographical error occurred prior.

(B)

It seems you are ignoring certain sequences.

There already exists efficient, non-cumbersome neurosynaptic chips that yield 10^14 synaptic operations per second. (of the estimated 10^16-18 synaptic operations computed by the human brain)



Such is quite the theistic behaviour; for you ignore viable sequences on the horizon of emotional bias.






(November 20, 2016 at 7:40 am)Mathilda Wrote: Hehehe

ProgrammingGodJordan just got banned on The Thinking Atheist. He posted the same OP there and it was pointed out quite how it had already turned out on AF. They obviously recognised that he lacked any entertainment value as a chew toy, would not respond to any questions and just kept spamming the same shit again and again.

His thread made 3 pages before he got banned.

http://www.thethinkingatheist.com/forum/...ype-of-God

I was indeed banned.
I had predominantly duplicated a response roughly thrice [including an identical portion in roughly three distinct responses], and so my activities were detected as spam.
Albeit, I tend to reuse responses, SOLELY where applicable.

NOTE: I notice, that I tend not to recieve banning, on threads where moderators partake in some profound science/study [physics, mathematics]. Otherwise, where intellect withers, bans are almost certain.

Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
LMAO.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
Since when Sam Harris is a neuroscientist?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof and evidence will always equal Science zwanzig 103 9864 December 17, 2021 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Young more likely to pray than over-55s - survey zebo-the-fat 16 2109 September 28, 2021 at 5:44 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Is God weaker than theists imagine, and is mankind stronger? invalid 6 2624 March 5, 2021 at 6:38 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Are miracles evidence of the existence of God? ido 74 6668 July 24, 2020 at 12:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Muslim students less likely to be awarded top class degrees. Succubus#2 28 3122 March 22, 2020 at 6:02 am
Last Post: Belacqua
  Religious fundamentalists more likely to believe fake news OakTree500 30 4779 November 10, 2018 at 4:32 pm
Last Post: no one
  If theists understood "evidence" Silver 135 16844 October 10, 2018 at 10:50 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Moses parting the sea evidence or just made up Smain 12 3376 June 28, 2018 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Are introverts less likely to like organised religion? Der/die AtheistIn 8 1577 March 22, 2018 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: GODZILLA
  Can religion be a type of Stockholm syndrome? ignoramus 5 2978 June 10, 2017 at 9:54 am
Last Post: Cyberman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)