Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 11, 2024, 9:44 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Josh McDowell
RE: Josh McDowell
Quote:but I would go back to God.

[Image: yodafail.jpg]
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan

Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.

Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.

You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Reply
RE: Josh McDowell
Brilliant Big Grin
[Image: Evolution.png]

Reply
RE: Josh McDowell
(August 29, 2011 at 11:00 am)salty Wrote: "The rejection of Christ is often not so much of the mind but of the will, not so much "I can't" but "I won't." - Josh McDowell, Evidence for Christianity

What's your gut reaction to this?
I'll be back to check, I'm going to watch my show. Smile

As someone who has tried on and off for the last twenty five years to NOT reject Christ, I have come to the conclusion, it's more 'I can't'. I don't think it's possible to conjure up the 'will power' to believe in someone who remains elusive and who you don't understand. So, it seems to boil down to people rejecting the 'idea' of Christ, rather than Him as a real person.
"The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility"

Albert Einstein
Reply
RE: Josh McDowell
(August 30, 2011 at 3:00 pm)Ace Otana Wrote: I always use Occam's Razer.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Ge...occam.html
A basic scientific principle.
You do realise that Father William of Occam was a theologian right Ace? Perhaps there is benefit in thinking outside of proof based disciplines?
Reply
RE: Josh McDowell
Yep, even the smarties get it wrong time to time. What next?
(Unless you really want to delve into why he believed that god was a simple concept, it's pretty much a whats what of atheism.)
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Josh McDowell
(August 31, 2011 at 3:03 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:
(August 30, 2011 at 3:00 pm)Ace Otana Wrote: I always use Occam's Razer.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Ge...occam.html
A basic scientific principle.
You do realise that Father William of Occam was a theologian right Ace? Perhaps there is benefit in thinking outside of proof based disciplines?

Doesn't matter who developed the principle. If it works I'll use it. Though I think his own principle goes against his beliefs. Anyway, it was altered and has become a scientific principle.

"one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything"
Explanation that require the fewest assumptions is most likely correct. Obviously the theologian didn't realise that adding a god into something will mean adding many assumptions. The principle works, that's all that matters. Don't matter who developed it.

"One should not make more assumptions than the minimum needed. "
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan

Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.

Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.

You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Reply
RE: Josh McDowell
Critical thinking see Ace.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Josh McDowell and the "atheistic" Internet Jehanne 43 6234 February 8, 2018 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  Josh Feuerstein goes on TV and gets roasted. TheRocketSurgeon 28 6555 September 27, 2015 at 7:29 pm
Last Post: Chad32



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)