Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
@Spooky Which 'spry 100 year old', particularly? Explain to me why a mentally alert, politically savvy, commited-to-democracy 100 year old wouldn't be a better choice than a fumbling, bumbling, fascist 77 year old.
C'mon, Spooky, you're better than a strawman spreader. I'd bet most of us (me included) would like a younger dem candidate. We're at the point here where it just needs to be Not chump, and Biden wouldn't be doing it, if it wasn't for the chump..
Right - an average. So on average, people aged 75+ are not running your country. And the lower age requirement is just as idiotic as an upper limit would be.
I presented an average. Why would I expect a nescient such as you to catch that? If you are 70+, you should be disqualified from becoming President. There's already a lower requirement of 35, which could filter out qualified candidates, why not an upper limit?
What percentage of millennials are working? Today, a large chunk of the workforce is occupied by Baby Boomers (19%), Generation X (35.5%), and Millennials (39.4%). With over 10,000 Baby Boomers per day reaching the age of 65, in 2030, we'll see Generation Z constitute about 30% of the workforce.