(July 26, 2015 at 6:12 am)Neimenovic Wrote:

(July 26, 2015 at 5:33 am)omnomnom Wrote: Plus, 51% in america of scientists believe in some form of intelligent design.

My bold. It's what you said.

And, I don't know how to break it to you, but nobody here argued that atheism is equal to science.

Wrong. Paendmoniums said:



atheism =/= science<br />
<br />
you remember that Dawkins was/is an evolutionary biologist who spent his entire career in a 'lab' (as if that means anything)? ^_^

I'm sorry, I really hate to break it to you and I feel second hand embarrassment having to explain it to you, but that is an equality sign with a line through it. It means 'does not equal'.

._.

Emma Watson

---

(July 26, 2015 at 6:16 am)Neimenovic Wrote: I'm sorry, I really hate to break it to you and I feel second hand embarrassment having to explain it to you, but that is an equality sign with a line through it. It means 'does not equal'.

._.

Oh.

Uhh, what? ._. Emma Watson?

(July 26, 2015 at 5:59 am)omnomnom Wrote: I'm not lying you fcker. 51% are I.D.eists.

Look:

---

I[...]

---

Oh, right - of course not. You're not lying - you're completely misunderstanding that questionable piece of "data" you dragged out. I'm sorry - I forgot you were very dim. 

Let me spell it out for you - "God" doesn't mean "Intelligent Design", you irredeemable moronic twit. It can mean all sorts of things to different people and all good scientists should leave their personal  beliefs (irrational or otherwise) outside the lab. "Intelligent Design" is a discredited line of reasoning, still pursued only by a handful of religiously motivated nuts.

Hope that helps, although I sincerely doubt it, since you're obviously way too deep in your own bullsh*t, and/or simply a particularly unpleasant troll.

(July 26, 2015 at 6:18 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:

(July 26, 2015 at 5:59 am)omnomnom Wrote: I'm not lying you fcker. 51% are I.D.eists.

Look:

---

I[...]

---

Oh, right - of course not. You're not lying - you're completely misunderstanding that questionable piece of "data" you dragged out. I'm sorry - I forgot you were very dim. 

Let me spell it out for you - "God" doesn't mean "Intelligent Design", you irredeemable moronic twit. It can mean all sorts of things to different people and all good scientists should leave their personal  beliefs (irrational or otherwise) outside the lab. "Intelligent Design" is a discredited line of reasoning, still pursued only by a handful of religiously motivated nuts.

Hope that helps, although I sincerely doubt it, since you're obviously way too deep in your own bullsh*t, and/or simply a particularly unpleasant troll.

[/quote]
Yes. I realized how stupid that was but don't assify my ego over it.

British people are awesome at rapping. I'll show you how it's done. Extra vocals by my dog.

http://youtu.be/lsNO2Prhgx4

Quote:I'm not lying you fcker. 51% are I.D.eists.

You realize, don't you, that belief in God does not necessarily equal support for Intelligent Design, right?

Boru

Looking around, the hypothesis would be more believable were it called completely-fucking-retarded-useless-twat design. Everything has come about and ended up in about the most stupid way it could possibly be and still limp over the finish line.