This thread was put in the off topic forums for a reason.
Warning: Reading this site can and will kill brain cells. End Warning.
Let's just find random pages and fact check them, and find facts omitted. We can also check what other people have written.
conservapedia.com

I will do the article on Atheism.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism

"As as alluded above"
This is a popular entry on the site. I would think it would have basic grammar down. Okay, ONWARDS!!!!

"Militant Atheism": Suppresses and Oppresses Theist to this day. Links to Atheism and Communism.
In communism, most cases have their leader turned into a God-like being.
Try looking at North Korea, or Mao being effectively worshipped.

"Atheism has a low retention rate"
Maybe because Atheism isn't a fucking cult?

Okay, now conflicting studies linked. Okay, let me guess. Without checking, the second study took place in a church.

This article omits that more atheistic countries like Japan have lower crime rates. It also omits that more more scientists are atheists compared to the percentage of atheists on a whole.
Okay, I will add more to this later. Go ahead and fact check this page more, or fact check other pages. I am simply running low on battery on what I am posting from.

Dou you do fact checks on sweetcorns in a pile of shit too? Conservapedia is the pile and the sweetcorn is ... I don't actually know what it is.

Haha, have you found a fact yet?

The only think I like about Conservapedia is that it sounds like an encyclopedia of conservation. Not what they intended.

I don't know how but somehow my mind always connects the words Conservapedia and constipation

(September 12, 2015 at 5:38 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: I don't know how but somehow my mind always connects the words Conservapedia and constipation

Goes with the phrase "diamond shitter" --- one whose ass is so tight they shit diamonds.

Did you hear they're doing their own version of the bible? As if the bible needed to be even crazier.

(September 12, 2015 at 6:06 pm)Cecelia Wrote: Did you hear they're doing their own version of the bible?  As if the bible needed to be even crazier.

Probably gets rid of all the help the poor shit.

Kyle from secular Talk did a video on this recently, to fact check the article about him. Conservapedia has a bias. They're quite up front about it. The complaint is that Wikipedia has a liberal bias, but truthfully reality itsself has a liberal bias. Conservatism doesn't last long, because it's hard to keep things the same in life. Everything changes from time to time. Everyone knows this. The harder you fight to maintain the status quo, the worse off things will get in the long run.

Yes, I noticed, but as much as I like Kyle, he's got a bias too. That's why I didn't watch the segment.