I think the evolution of man and woman as actually changed in the last 100 years and in actual fact every 20 years or even every year if you look close enough.. Look at people on films from the 1920s and 30s dont you see these human beings look different to our modern gilrs and boys. Dont give me that excuse, oh they only look different because of the fashion they wear is different from todays fashion. I think thats a rubbish excuse. Look at 1930s women do they look anything  like modern girls. Well of course not. In fact in that time there was hardly a stunning looking girl but today they are mostly all stunning. Why is that. Noone as  commented on the evolution of the human being as changed in the last 100 years. Can you imagine a guy of the 1920s wearing jeans and saying hey dude. It would not suit him and he would not look the part. Simarily different eras like the sixties bands. Why did they all come about that particular period. Those type of bands should be around all the time since the that time. It seems strange to me. Its like its all meant to be a certain time and place, but thats not how chance works . Chance is all the time. Are you saying sixties type bands exist today but they dont play because they would not suit our era. i think thats rubbish talk. That would mean there is another beatles band wanting to play today but they are in hiding instead.

That's impressively stupid. Thank you for your time.

Boru

Environmental factors.
The last 100 years involves about 4 generations.

Make up, hairstyles, clothing, "duck face", "selfies", etc. All factors in photographs.

If you take a woman from Classical Greece and put her in modern clothes, do her hair, etc., she'll look like she belongs here.

All the busts of Antinous I've seen are smoking hot.

Woot !

(and he's 2000 years older than me, who's my daddy now ?)

(October 10, 2015 at 7:44 pm)Gawdzilla Wrote: Make up, hairstyles, clothing, "duck face", "selfies", etc. All factors in photographs.

If you take a woman from Classical Greece and put her in modern clothes, do her hair, etc., she'll look like she belongs here.

Indeed.

Plus I can defeat that entire argument in two words:

Audrey Hepburn!

(October 10, 2015 at 7:29 pm)justin65 Wrote:

---

I think the evolution of man and woman as actually changed in the last 100 years and in actual fact every 20 years or even every year if you look close enough.. Look at people on films from the 1920s and 30s dont you see these human beings look different to our modern gilrs and boys. Dont give me that excuse, oh they only look different because of the fashion they wear is different from todays fashion. I think thats a rubbish excuse. Look at 1930s women do they look anything  like modern girls. Well of course not. In fact in that time there was hardly a stunning looking girl but today they are mostly all stunning. Why is that. Noone as  commented on the evolution of the human being as changed in the last 100 years. Can you imagine a guy of the 1920s wearing jeans and saying hey dude. It would not suit him and he would not look the part. Simarily different eras like the sixties bands. Why did they all come about that particular period. Those type of bands should be around all the time since the that time. It seems strange to me. Its like its all meant to be a certain time and place, but thats not how chance works . Chance is all the time. Are you saying sixties type bands exist today but they dont play because they would not suit our era. i think thats rubbish talk. That would mean there is another beatles band wanting to play today but they are in hiding instead.

---

Perhaps you could try again. With paragraphs, better spelling and proper punctuation please?

I stopped evolving in the 80's. Got any thoughts on that?

(October 10, 2015 at 8:00 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: I stopped evolving in the 80's. Got any thoughts on that?

Got anything to do with them changing Coke?

(October 10, 2015 at 8:00 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: I stopped evolving in the 80's. Got any thoughts on that?

I hear you. I still idolize Max Headroom.