Men and boys can be raped and are, by other men or by women. Were they "asking for it" too? You're not even making a coherent argument. I've already told you that clothing or lack thereof is no indicator of sexual context, it's not an excuse. Why should anyone have to plan what they want to wear just to prevent someone else's crime? That's selfish.

(January 17, 2016 at 5:31 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:

(January 17, 2016 at 5:23 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote: Are you sure?  Aren't you the one that thinks He wired us this way?

What the ef, whateverist.

Oh, I see the problem.

You know, the best reason to be having this conversation is because when someone is raped and the rapist is prosecuted inevitably his defense will attempt to paint the victim as a slut. If people would challenge their assumptions about what a provocatively dressed woman means before violence happens perhaps they wouldn't have to do it in court. There obviously needs to be major work done to change this reflexive mindset. The way a women dresses should never be used to justify any man's action, especially not ones which turn women into victims.

(January 17, 2016 at 4:24 pm)Homeless Nutter Wrote:

(January 16, 2016 at 8:27 pm)MTL Wrote: Aww, that's sweet.

I'm glad you like my posts, because they're long as fuck.

Brevity is not my strong suit.
[...]

Your word-count is fine. Your paragraphing is atrocious.

Your posts often look like poems, which can be quite distracting, as - instead of focusing on the content - I find myself instinctively looking for hidden meanings and metaphors, while stroking my beard and thinking "Hmmm... This doesn't quite rhyme."

LOL

I am trying to avoid the wall-of-text effect,
by breaking it into readable chunks,
because I am so long-winded.

I have fallen asleep in the middle of typing my replies, more than once.

fact.

(January 17, 2016 at 4:08 pm)*Deidre* Wrote:

(January 16, 2016 at 8:27 pm)MTL Wrote: Aww, that's sweet.

I'm glad you like my posts, because they're long as fuck.

Brevity is not my strong suit.

I'm surprised no-one has ever said this to me, yet:

but you write well, so it doesn't appear wordy...if that makes sense. 

well, you're very kind.  Thank you.

Quote:popsthebuilder
The problem is in the advertisement of the goods. Say your in the grocery store and see some food you like. You may justify not buying it for whatever reason. But then a couple aisles over there are free samples. Well you love that food and here it is right here for the taking. You gonna get some.

What a horrible, stupid analogy. I guess a cretin like you sees nothing wrong with comparing a living, breathing, human being with a heart, feelings, and a family that loves her, to a piece of meat on a toothpick. Is there any circumstance in which you'd be okay with someone to relegating your wife, daughter, or your mother to being a nice, juicy hunk of cuntsteak?

Quote:popsthebuilder
It isn't dressing like a whore that men have a problem with. The problem is that according to some women, it is false advertisement. That can lead to many negative things, least of which isn't forced rape or prison.

Having a deeply flawed pathology and a penchant for violence is what causes people to rape; that's why it happens to women who are fully clothed, men, and young children alike. Seeing a bra strap or pantyline will not incite a normal man to commit such a violent and criminal act, so there's no need to suck the majority of decent men into your shitty narrative.

Quote:popsthebuilder
So I guess if your promiscuous then dress accordingly, and if not dress accordingly. Or if you feel the need to fantasize about being a whore then don't get bent out a shape when someone wants to take you up on your insinuated offer.

I took the liberty of bolding your most ridiculous comment as an example of the flawed thinking and delusions sexually aggressive men use to rationalize their behavior. I pity any woman in your life, as well as any living within a 30-mile radius or so of you. 

Before you accuse me of drawing an unfair conclusion about you, consider the fact that you're perfectly fine with concluding that any woman dressed in what you consider to be inappropriate, fantasizes about being a whore. 

So, judging by your statements, I feel comfortable concluding that you're probably a fucking monster.

(January 17, 2016 at 3:54 pm)Losty Wrote:

(January 17, 2016 at 3:49 pm)popsthebuilder Wrote: No, but it easier to control things with negation of temptation.

Not justifying tape in any way, shape, or form. Nor am I advocating for the restriction of acceptable clothing. Just stating The obvious.

A dog can be a good pet. But if you leave it alone with an unguarded steak it may eat it. If you hadn't left it with the steak then it can't eat it.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

I like this one better.

In the first one women were groceries but men were still men.

In this one women are steaks and men are dogs. lol. It's so nice.

(January 17, 2016 at 5:54 pm)MTL Wrote:

(January 17, 2016 at 4:24 pm)Homeless Nutter Wrote: Your word-count is fine. Your paragraphing is atrocious.

Your posts often look like poems, which can be quite distracting, as - instead of focusing on the content - I find myself instinctively looking for hidden meanings and metaphors, while stroking my beard and thinking "Hmmm... This doesn't quite rhyme."

LOL

I am trying to avoid the wall-of-text effect,
by breaking it into readable chunks,
because I am so long-winded.

I have fallen asleep in the middle of typing my replies, more than once.

fact.

Personally I love your posting style.

(January 17, 2016 at 6:05 pm)Losty Wrote:

(January 17, 2016 at 5:54 pm)MTL Wrote: LOL

I am trying to avoid the wall-of-text effect,
by breaking it into readable chunks,
because I am so long-winded.

I have fallen asleep in the middle of typing my replies, more than once.

fact.

Personally I love your posting style.

Thanks, Losty.