(November 4, 2016 at 7:38 am)abaris Wrote:

(November 4, 2016 at 7:18 am)SofaKingHigh Wrote: My point was the name of the album; Gary Glitter is a convicted paedophile.

I got the irony the first time round.

Clearly. 

Nah he did, Sofa, Abaris just ain't amused easily. I like him though. I like both of you.

(November 3, 2016 at 3:58 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Oh. I mean... did you see the full list of evidence thump?

I'm trying to be fair too. With that evidence the likelihood of him being innocent is close to nothing right?

I read some of the evidence -- I worked in Santa Barbara when his trial was being held, coverage locally was pretty intense.

I'm of the opinion he probably did some rotten things to those poor kids, but my opinion doesn't determine the facts.

I'm also old enough to remember the McMartin preschool witch-hunt, and how innocent people had their lives ruined over false allegations of pedophila, so I prefer to tread carefully.

Well yeah... but I'm pretty sure those people didn't have photographs of naked adults with children's faces morphed on top...

(November 4, 2016 at 7:50 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Nah he did, Sofa, Abaris just ain't amused easily. I like him though. I like both of you.

Abaris actually cracks me up. He seems so serious and almost robotic in his tone all the time, but then he'll break out the occasional fart comment and it's hilarious.

(November 5, 2016 at 12:04 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Well yeah... but I'm pretty sure those people didn't have photographs of naked adults with children's faces morphed on top...

It's not illegal to be disturbed.

That's true but that wasn't the only evidence.

(November 5, 2016 at 12:17 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(November 5, 2016 at 12:04 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Well yeah...  but I'm pretty sure those people didn't have photographs of naked adults with children's faces morphed on top...

It's not illegal to be disturbed.

But are you licensed for it, a process that begins with asking your doctor if you're healthy enough to get so worked up about shit.

(November 5, 2016 at 12:19 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: That's true but that wasn't the only evidence.

I was answering your post, not all the evidence.

We each have our own preferences in deciding what we think about this or that. I'm comfortable with my approach.

(November 5, 2016 at 12:19 am)Whateverist Wrote:

(November 5, 2016 at 12:17 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: It's not illegal to be disturbed.

But are you licensed for it, a process that begins with asking your doctor if you're healthy enough to get so worked up about shit.

I don't need no steenkin' license!