(June 17, 2011 at 1:45 pm)Atheist Jew Wrote: Ermmm...Would anyone tell Napoleon to defend his position?

No.

If he cares to reply to you: he will. If he doesn't: he won't.

Could I tell him to? Sure. But I won't. Because I'm just not that type of Orc.

I AM HERE TO GRACE YOU ALL WITH MY PRESENCE!

Seen as I was requested in this very polite private message, entitled "Dont be a coward":

AtheistPoo Wrote:Pardon me, Napoleon, may you grace the thread "An Inconvenient Question(s) with your presence, and give us your much appreciated opinion on why you voted the way you did? Just asking, of course, I wouldn't want to bother such a busy person. Though the way you just voted and left may be interpreted by myself and others as showing cowardice.

I'll answer your oh so important question. Did he answer your questions successfully?

Well.

Yes.

He answered them didn't he? I don't necessarily agree with the answers but he's answered all the questions provided.

Why make a poll then get all shitty when someone answered said poll with the option you don't like?

(June 17, 2011 at 2:25 pm)Atheist Jew Wrote: He did not provide correct answers. To even begin to imagine the argument occuring here, imagine there are three people talking to one another:
P1. What is one plus one?
P2. It's four, and besides, you said it was six!
P1. No, I didn't. Any how, one plus one equals two because one represents one unit, and two of them equal two units, which represent two.
P2. You just said one plus one equals seven! It is four! And I have proof of it!
To Be Continued...

You seem to be missing the point of your own poll. You didn't ask 'Did he answer my questions correctly', you asked 'Did he answer my questions successfully'.

I could answer 1+1 with "17". It's not correct, but I was certainly a success in answering the question. Doesn't mean I gave the right answer.

See what I mean?

Not sure, I don't post too many polls myself. Btw what was with the neutral reputation point with the copy and pasted private message?

(June 17, 2011 at 3:47 pm)Atheist Jew Wrote: The reputation point was first, then came the message. Also how do you give someone a negative point?

Negative points are not allowed, it leads to negativity or some shit... ask one of the mods.

Neutrals are basically the substitute, and generally you don't give them out to let someone know to respond to a post.

(June 17, 2011 at 3:50 pm)Napoleon Wrote:

(June 17, 2011 at 3:47 pm)Atheist Jew Wrote: The reputation point was first, then came the message. Also how do you give someone a negative point?

Negative points are not allowed, it leads to negativity or some shit... ask one of the mods.

Or ask me. Different viewpoint on negativity and different styles of regulating it.

Quote:Neutrals are basically the substitute, and generally you don't give them out to let someone know to respond to a post.

But marshally one might give them out just for the heck of things.

(June 17, 2011 at 4:04 pm)Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote: Or ask me. Different viewpoint on negativity and different styles of regulating it.

But marshally one might give them out just for the heck of things.

Yeah. You can also give out positives... (*HINT HINT*)

(June 17, 2011 at 4:06 pm)Napoleon Wrote: Yeah. You can also give out positives... (*HINT HINT*)

Already done, hon.

Well Duh.

(June 17, 2011 at 4:55 pm)Atheist Jew Wrote: Then what is the point of showing a negatives column?

You tell me