Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 3, 2026, 2:58 am
Thread Rating:
|
Zero-Emission Fossil Fuels
|
|
I had a customer with a natural gas compressor. When they where doing their environmental certifications, the air coming out of the stack was cleaner than what was going into the engine. The guy doing the tests naturally questioned the reading, so he went to get another meter from his truck. Same results. That's good efficiency there!
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther (May 24, 2017 at 4:56 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: This could be BIG! zero-emission fossil fuels: Here Just had to throw a dig in, eh? RE: Zero-Emission Fossil Fuels
May 24, 2017 at 5:21 pm
(This post was last modified: May 24, 2017 at 5:25 pm by Pat Mustard.)
(May 24, 2017 at 4:56 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: This could be BIG! zero-emission fossil fuels: Here Without even looking at the article, I'm calling bullshit on this. First of all there is no energy conversion system known to man that is lossless, every power plant has some form of emission. Secondly what happens to the generated biproducts in the system? If the company is claiming anything close to zero emissions on fossil fuels then it is lying plain and simple. And then I looked at the article and I saw this: Quote:"This is the biggest thing in carbon capture," says Howard Herzog, a chemical engineer and carbon capture expert at MIT. "It's very sound on paper. We'll see soon if it works in reality. There are only a million things that can go wrong." The whole thing is simply at hypothesis stage, it has not been tried, it has not been tested. Fuck it, I wouldn't put it past them that this is simply a back of a fag packet diagram they've decided to bullshit into massive state funding for the greenbacks.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home (May 24, 2017 at 5:14 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(May 24, 2017 at 4:56 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: This could be BIG! zero-emission fossil fuels: Here Yeah. I'm kind of a prick like that. (May 24, 2017 at 5:23 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(May 24, 2017 at 5:14 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Just had to throw a dig in, eh? You're 50% prick, 50% unlettered idiot. No wonder you fall for bullshit like this so often.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home RE: Zero-Emission Fossil Fuels
May 24, 2017 at 5:29 pm
(This post was last modified: May 24, 2017 at 5:31 pm by Amarok.)
Yes it all has to be the evil environmentalists .And the contrary are perfect angels . Who never engage in any kind of unreasonable activity. Or hold in reasonable opinions and or solutions
And looking at the paper I also call bullshit. Just another scam by the fossil fuel industry to save themselves and there struggling industry from the dust pin of history. (May 24, 2017 at 5:26 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote:(May 24, 2017 at 5:23 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Yeah. I'm kind of a prick like that. No prick is to nice more like long winded pompous asshole .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Lets do a hypothetical though, and say that fossil fuels could be brought down to close to 0 emissions. Do you still work towards the elimination of using oil? Why or why not?
(May 24, 2017 at 4:56 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: This could be BIG! zero-emission fossil fuels: Here Sure, zero emission coal would be a win for everyone. Except for those of us who object to coal sludge in our water, I mean. Even if you whip ALL the emissions associated with fossil fuels, it is a notoriously dirty process to get them out of the ground in the first place. Mercury, lead, sulfur, arsenic, selenium, and a whole host of other contaminants you wouldn't want to get within a long mile of if you could help it are intrinsic to the extraction processes. Granted, renewables have their own problems. We all remember the horror of the big Wind Spill Of 2005 - flags fluttered as much as 100 feet way and at least half a dozen birds were momentarily startled. Tragic. Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
RE: Zero-Emission Fossil Fuels
May 24, 2017 at 6:13 pm
(This post was last modified: May 24, 2017 at 6:14 pm by CapnAwesome.)
(May 24, 2017 at 6:11 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(May 24, 2017 at 4:56 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: This could be BIG! zero-emission fossil fuels: Here wind power is a big problem for birds actually, it kills thousands of birds a year. But the problem with it is that there isn't enough of it to power much of anything. If are willing to not use electricity then wind power is great.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| microsoft supports giving fossil fuels companies immunity from lawsuits | Cepheus Ace | 1 | 707 |
May 7, 2019 at 6:00 am Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama |
|
| Day Zero, Capetown. | The Grand Nudger | 40 | 12681 |
January 26, 2018 at 12:16 pm Last Post: Whateverist |
|
| ???? Is No one going to mention the nose dive clinton took at ground zero? | Drich | 183 | 57720 |
September 20, 2016 at 2:45 pm Last Post: Pat Mustard |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


