(May 31, 2018 at 2:50 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote:

(May 31, 2018 at 2:43 pm)Ybe Wrote: When the days come that all delusions are seen for what they are, As,will no longer be As and will  long to be back to this day.

If you can't convince them with bullshit, respond with the same tired old threats; "Just you wait until my invisible friend gets you!"

A will always be A.  You can't have the alphabet without them.

That you equate what I said with what you said is why the Q in post 1.
(As) usually take it as a fact that some day that they will no longer be
 thus what is longed for will be accomplished (at least for them).

I actually wonder what Ybe would sound like in real life. Would he sound as trollishly incoherent?

(May 31, 2018 at 2:51 pm)drfuzzy Wrote:

(May 31, 2018 at 2:44 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: That's nice dear.  At least you managed to talk like a human for that whole post.

An asshole troll, spewing threats now, - but yeah, he actually spelled out whole words!!!  Ybe reminds me of Russell's Teapot:

---

We are trying to prove As have a logical reason for being an A.

A-teapotists need to start their own thread or forum and then prove their own rationality for being what they are... don't you think?

---

(May 31, 2018 at 3:06 pm)Losty Wrote:

(May 31, 2018 at 2:24 pm)Ybe Wrote: BUT the Q is  what logical reason do As have for what they assert...

What assertion?

The ones they have asserted for the last 40 pages or so.

(May 31, 2018 at 3:08 pm)Ybe Wrote:

(May 31, 2018 at 2:50 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: If you can't convince them with bullshit, respond with the same tired old threats; "Just you wait until my invisible friend gets you!"

A will always be A.  You can't have the alphabet without them.

That you equate what I said with what you said is why the Q in post 1.
(As) usually take it as a fact that some day that they will no longer be
 thus what is longed for will be accomplished (at least for them).

*Yawn*

Done with your bullshit.

I'll sit back and wait for the reports of trolling to roll in.

(May 31, 2018 at 3:10 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I actually wonder what Ybe would sound like in real life.  Would he sound as trollishly incoherent?

In all my posts I don't think I have ever called anyone a troll. But perhaps you think someone who asks people for a reason for coherence is trollish?  

Which is much the same as asking, "Would he sound as trollishly incoherent?

Real life?

Dear sweet Faithless,
There are many ways in life to sound.
Just as there are many ways to look at
problems people display....

So, in looking at As obvious problems from, a clear objective vantage point we see that the Q is a great way to help A's see their subjective problem.
Don't you think?

(May 31, 2018 at 3:28 pm)Ybe Wrote:

(May 31, 2018 at 3:10 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I actually wonder what Ybe would sound like in real life.  Would he sound as trollishly incoherent?

In all my posts I don't think I have ever called anyone a troll. But perhaps you think someone who asks people for a reason for coherence is trollish?  

Which is much the same as asking, "Would he sound as trollishly incoherent?

Real life?

Dear sweet Faithless,
There are many ways in life to sound.
Just as there are many ways to look at
problems people display....

So, in looking at As obvious problems from, a clear objective vantage point we see that the Q is a great way to help A's see their subjective problem.
Don't you think?

You combine Rik's obfuscation and Drich's impenetrable air of smugness.

Also, let me say I sure appreciate y'all for taking time to read my posts.

In my book, trying to help people overcome their problems fears doubts etc. is a loving thing to do.

In fact, giving up ones life for someone else is a loving kind sweet thing to do also, especially when they are acting in a way that is unreasonably unkind.

I am reminded of the story of Jesus, which is so strong whether you accept it as true or not.

Nails put in, he pleads, "Father forgive them they know not what they do...."

Lets not try to find out what YB is like as there are so many aspects and nuances to people.
I am a very loving enjoyable person. A sinner who is trusting Jesus promise. But you should know that.
I have a family, friends, work, and lots of experiences etc.

Anyway, enough of that. Let's try to focus on the Q and see if we can get some A's some help. OK

(May 31, 2018 at 3:42 pm)Ybe Wrote: Also, let me say I sure appreciate y'all for taking time to read my posts.

In my book, trying to help people overcome their problems fears doubts etc. is a loving thing to do.

In fact, giving up ones life for someone else is a loving kind sweet thing to do also, especially when they are acting in a way that is unreasonably unkind.

I am reminded of the story of Jesus, which is so strong whether you accept it as true or not.

Nails put in, he pleads, "Father forgive them they know not what they do...."

Lets not try to find out what YB is like as there are so many aspects and nuances to people.
I am a very loving enjoyable person.  A sinner who is trusting Jesus promise. But you should know that.
I have a family, friends, work, and lots of experiences etc.

Anyway, enough of  that. Let's try to focus on the Q and see if we can get some A's some help. OK

No help is needed.  We did not ask for your disrespect, condescension and contempt.  Preaching is offensive.  I couldn't give a crap what you think your imaginary god-boy did or didn't do.  You really need to accept the FSM into your life.  You would be a lot less of an asshole.

Atheism is a negative word; a (no) and Theos (G). The word itself is an assertion without a base in a logical argument.
As have nothing in way of a positive arguments. All they can say is, “I lack Sufficient Evidence of ”

They lack sufficient E of unicorns, leprechauns. etc. also. Lets donate and start a new forum that gathers around the common idea of "lack of sufficient evidence" for invisible Popnologicuses. And then see if the members will devote themselves to defending being A-Popnologicuses , for years on end.

Popnologicuses = all around us, knowable, fathomable, invisible, reason
A-Popnologicuses = lacking belief, due to insufficient evidence, for the all around us, knowable, fathomable, invisible, reason.

They probably wouldn't have a logical reasonable reason for being that either.
Or would they? do do do do do do do do doooooooooooooo (Twilight Zone Theme)

(

(May 31, 2018 at 4:46 pm)Ybe Wrote: Atheism is a negative word;  a (no) and Theos (G). The word itself is an assertion without a base in a logical argument.
As  have nothing in way of a positive arguments.  All they can say is, “I lack Sufficient  Evidence of ”

They lack sufficient E of unicorns, leprechauns. etc. also. Lets donate and start a new forum that gathers around the common idea of "lack of sufficient evidence" for invisible Popnologicuses.  And then see if  the members will devote themselves to defending being A-Popnologicuses , for years on end.

Popnologicuses =  all around us,  knowable, fathomable, invisible, reason
A-Popnologicuses = lacking belief, due to insufficient evidence, for the all around us, knowable, fathomable, invisible, reason.

They probably wouldn't have a logical reasonable reason for being that either.
Or would they? do do do do   do do do do doooooooooooooo (Twilight Zone Theme)

(