Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 23, 2024, 11:14 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ontological Disproof of God
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(August 26, 2018 at 2:10 am)Losty Wrote: My brain is spinning trying to figure out how to fix this one lol.

Lol. It's times like these that I wish I was green, because I love the puzzle of trying to fix fucked up quotes... the more complicated/nested the better Wink Maybe you guys could create another level of mod, below greens? Wink ... ie greens still make all the decisions but you have something below that to do the mind-numbing grunt work like removing duplicates and fixing quotes... because some people, unaccountably, enjoy that kind of work and find it relaxing Wink J/K (or not if it's a possibility Big Grin)

Anyway, in the post you're quoting, one place to start might be the bad tag; [/quote/]... under the line that says 'How are we enslaved by law'. Though I doubt that would fix everything... it's at least a place to start Wink
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(August 26, 2018 at 7:46 am)emjay Wrote:
(August 26, 2018 at 2:10 am)Losty Wrote: My brain is spinning trying to figure out how to fix this one lol.

Lol. It's times like these that I wish I was green, because I love the puzzle of trying to fix fucked up quotes... the more complicated/nested the better Wink Maybe you guys could create another level of mod, below greens? Wink ... ie greens still make all the decisions but you have something below that to do the mind-numbing grunt work like removing duplicates and fixing quotes... because some people, unaccountably, enjoy that kind of work and find it relaxing Wink J/K (or not if it's a possibility Big Grin)

Anyway, in the post you're quoting, one place to start might be the bad tag; [/quote/]... under the line that says 'How are we enslaved by law'. Though I doubt that would fix everything... it's at least a place to start Wink

I usually like fixing quotes too but for some reason (I think maybe because I already fixed like 35 quotes) that one was too much for me. Haha. No one even reported these. I was just fixing them anyway because that’s what I do when I’m bored and I can’t sleep.

Anywho I’ll check out that broken quote tag and see what i can manage. Hehe thanks!
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(August 25, 2018 at 10:17 pm)negatio Wrote:
Quote:What fundamental religious beliefs are you destructing?
Jehovah's mistaken notion that he could efficiently/successfully reign as God, over men,by positing a series of laws, which, he mistakenly thought, would function either to determine man's conduct directly, via the word,or, move men to determine themselves, by law, to act in accordance with law. When, in fact, human conduct does not originate on the basis of given states of affairs like a language of law.

But Jehovah does not have a "notion". It does not exist in reality except as a concept, a mental construct of humans. Just like all of the other gods through out history. I'm not sure why you seem to have focused on the Judeo-Christian/Abrahamic god. 

Humans make laws for control, structure and order, in an attempt to effect behavior and actions.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(August 26, 2018 at 7:50 am)Losty Wrote:
(August 26, 2018 at 7:46 am)emjay Wrote: Lol. It's times like these that I wish I was green, because I love the puzzle of trying to fix fucked up quotes... the more complicated/nested the better Wink Maybe you guys could create another level of mod, below greens? Wink ... ie greens still make all the decisions but you have something below that to do the mind-numbing grunt work like removing duplicates and fixing quotes... because some people, unaccountably, enjoy that kind of work and find it relaxing Wink J/K (or not if it's a possibility Big Grin)

Anyway, in the post you're quoting, one place to start might be the bad tag; [/quote/]... under the line that says 'How are we enslaved by law'. Though I doubt that would fix everything... it's at least a place to start Wink

I usually like fixing quotes too but for some reason (I think maybe because I already fixed like 35 quotes) that one was too much for me. Haha. No one even reported these. I was just fixing them anyway because that’s what I do when I’m bored and I can’t sleep.

Anywho I’ll check out that broken quote tag and see what i can manage. Hehe thanks!

35?... you lightweight Wink You're talking to Mr ISO here and all the fun that brings (or used to bring) Wink
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(August 26, 2018 at 7:57 am)emjay Wrote:
(August 26, 2018 at 7:50 am)Losty Wrote: I usually like fixing quotes too but for some reason (I think maybe because I already fixed like 35 quotes) that one was too much for me. Haha. No one even reported these. I was just fixing them anyway because that’s what I do when I’m bored and I can’t sleep.

Anywho I’ll check out that broken quote tag and see what i can manage. Hehe thanks!

35?... you lightweight Wink You're talking to Mr ISO here and all the fun that brings (or used to bring) Wink

LOL! Some of those towards the end were really messed up. They’d have tons of quote tags seemingly randomly added in. Then I’d have to actually go back and read the posts being quoted to figure out where the tags belonged and where they didn’t. And this stuff isn’t easy to read considering it all looks like Latin to me.

Yes, Squishy, I am a lightweight but I can’t help it my brain gets scrambled easily Tongue
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(August 26, 2018 at 8:11 am)Losty Wrote:
(August 26, 2018 at 7:57 am)emjay Wrote: 35?... you lightweight Wink You're talking to Mr ISO here and all the fun that brings (or used to bring) Wink

LOL! Some of those towards the end were really messed up. They’d have tons of quote tags seemingly randomly added in. Then I’d have to actually go back and read the posts being quoted to figure out where the tags belonged and where they didn’t. And this stuff isn’t easy to read considering it all looks like Latin to me.

Yes, Squishy, I am a lightweight but I can’t help it my brain gets scrambled easily Tongue

Yeah... I think those random ones are maybe him experimenting with creating his own quotes from scratch... probably not the best idea until he understands what tags are in general... since if incorrectly used it just creates even more of a mess.

Even more impressive since at last check you only used a mobile? Have you got a laptop/tablet now? I can't imagine trying to fix all this on a mobile Panic Wink

Anyway just kidding about the lightweight... I think 35 would be plenty enough for a nice relaxing session Wink
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(August 26, 2018 at 8:40 am)emjay Wrote:
(August 26, 2018 at 8:11 am)Losty Wrote: LOL! Some of those towards the end were really messed up. They’d have tons of quote tags seemingly randomly added in. Then I’d have to actually go back and read the posts being quoted to figure out where the tags belonged and where they didn’t. And this stuff isn’t easy to read considering it all looks like Latin to me.

Yes, Squishy, I am a lightweight but I can’t help it my brain gets scrambled easily Tongue

Yeah... I think those random ones are maybe him experimenting with creating his own quotes from scratch... probably not the best idea until he understands what tags are in general... since if incorrectly used it just creates even more of a mess.

Even more impressive since at last check you only used a mobile? Have you got a laptop/tablet now? I can't imagine trying to fix all this on a mobile Panic Wink

Anyway just kidding about the lightweight... I think 35 would be plenty enough for a nice relaxing session Wink

I do have a laptop but I never use it for AF, I did all that from my phone haha. Some were more difficult just because the posts were so long I couldn’t copy paste the part I wanted because it was bigger than my whole screen, I probably should have gotten the laptop out that would’ve made it a lot easier. I really need to practice using it more anyway.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(August 26, 2018 at 8:44 am)Losty Wrote:
(August 26, 2018 at 8:40 am)emjay Wrote: Yeah... I think those random ones are maybe him experimenting with creating his own quotes from scratch... probably not the best idea until he understands what tags are in general... since if incorrectly used it just creates even more of a mess.

Even more impressive since at last check you only used a mobile? Have you got a laptop/tablet now? I can't imagine trying to fix all this on a mobile Panic Wink

Anyway just kidding about the lightweight... I think 35 would be plenty enough for a nice relaxing session Wink

I do have a laptop but I never use it for AF, I did all that from my phone haha. Some were more difficult just because the posts were so long I couldn’t copy paste the part I wanted because it was bigger than my whole screen, I probably should have gotten the laptop out that would’ve made it a lot easier. I really need to practice using it more anyway.

Hey, don't feel bad. I write code for a living and some of those had me going WT actual F????
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(August 26, 2018 at 8:44 am)Losty Wrote:
(August 26, 2018 at 8:40 am)emjay Wrote: Yeah... I think those random ones are maybe him experimenting with creating his own quotes from scratch... probably not the best idea until he understands what tags are in general... since if incorrectly used it just creates even more of a mess.

Even more impressive since at last check you only used a mobile? Have you got a laptop/tablet now? I can't imagine trying to fix all this on a mobile Panic Wink

Anyway just kidding about the lightweight... I think 35 would be plenty enough for a nice relaxing session Wink

I do have a laptop but I never use it for AF, I did all that from my phone haha. Some were more difficult just because the posts were so long I couldn’t copy paste the part I wanted because it was bigger than my whole screen, I probably should have gotten the laptop out that would’ve made it a lot easier. I really need to practice using it more anyway.

Wow Worship You da (wo)man if you can do that Wink
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(August 26, 2018 at 7:52 am)mh.brewer Wrote:
(August 25, 2018 at 10:17 pm)negatio Wrote: Jehovah's mistaken notion that he could efficiently/successfully reign as God, over men,by positing a series of laws, which, he mistakenly thought, would function either to determine man's conduct directly, via the word,or, move men to determine themselves, by law, to act in accordance with law. When, in fact, human conduct does not originate on the basis of given states of affairs like a language of law.

But Jehovah does not have a "notion". It does not exist in reality except as a concept, a mental construct of humans. Just like all of the other gods through out history. I'm not sure why you seem to have focused on the Judeo-Christian/Abrahamic god. 

Humans make laws for control, structure and order, in an attempt to effect behavior and actions.
mh.brewer
'Notion'; 'Reality'; "Concept';  Mental'; Lawxxanalytic philosophers question these human constructs ad infinitum.  Nonetheless, we still employ these suspect terms.  The point is that human beings have thought, for thousands of years, that Yahweh sent Moses down to the children of Israel with stone tablets, inscribed by the finger of God, bearing law whereby Yahweh had the notion that he could determine these children in their conduct ; since then, (be it fiction, or, whatever) men have, with tremendous travail, employed "law"; now, I am here pursuing a theoretical destruction of the notion "law", I, we, have to use some semiotic unit to say that Yahweh conceived "law".  Precisely brewer, "law", in a very vigorous sense, does not in fact exist as a Platonic form type of being, and so on and so on; however there is a very real sense in which "law" is here, within our sociosphere, and we have reached the point where we so radically over-apply the theoretical construct that is "law", that "law" is become destructive of human beings who quit their businesses because law has required so  much of them that they cannot function...and on and on and on...there are examples of our having reached the point in our civilization, where law is a maladaptive means to attaining civilization....Thank you mh.brewer. Negaato.

(August 26, 2018 at 8:50 am)Abaddon_ire Wrote:
(August 26, 2018 at 8:44 am)Losty Wrote: I do have a laptop but I never use it for AF, I did all that from my phone haha. Some were more difficult just because the posts were so long I couldn’t copy paste the part I wanted because it was bigger than my whole screen, I probably should have gotten the laptop out that would’ve made it a lot easier. I really need to practice using it more anyway.

Hey, don't feel bad. I write code for a living and some of those had me going WT actual F????
Losty   Hey, all you incredible human phagocytes who are running through the sclerotic veins of the disastrous cancer that was my thread, eating-up all the horror, you are heroes !  Thanks so so much !  I know you all suffered, and, it hurts me to think that, probably, I am causing you more phagocytic labor as I write at precisely this moment.  But I must have won your respect or something, else my ass wound probably be banned by now. Negatio.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The classic ontological argument Modern Atheism 20 1056 October 3, 2024 at 12:45 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The modal ontological argument for God Disagreeable 29 1697 August 10, 2024 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: CuriosityBob
  My own moral + ontological argument. Mystic 37 12440 April 17, 2018 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: FatAndFaithless
  Ontological Limericks chimp3 12 3723 December 22, 2016 at 3:22 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument FallentoReason 7 3457 November 21, 2016 at 10:57 am
Last Post: FallentoReason
  How would you describe your ontological views? The Skeptic 10 3290 July 29, 2014 at 11:28 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Ontological Arguments - A Comprehensive Refutation MindForgedManacle 23 6443 March 20, 2014 at 1:48 am
Last Post: Rabb Allah
  The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic Rational AKD 82 34893 February 17, 2014 at 9:36 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  The modal ontological argument - without modal logic proves atheism max-greece 15 5985 February 14, 2014 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  The Ontological Argument MindForgedManacle 18 6777 August 22, 2013 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: Jackalope



Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)