Posts: 259
Threads: 1
Joined: August 20, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 11, 2018 at 8:52 pm
(September 11, 2018 at 8:21 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Several people here - myself included - have given you actionable suggestions on how you can help yourself here. That includes:
Writing an introduction in the Introductions subsection
Engaging with staff in the Questions For Staff subsection instead of bickering/whining with/about them
Learning to competently use the forum software (including formatting posts so they're readable (an empty line between paragraphs))
Providing some background on your ideas, or places/authors/links where one can learn it on their own without insult
You keep claiming I'm mad or angry. I'm not. Annoyed perhaps, but nothing more. What I want to see is if you'll hang yourself with more refusals, weak justifications, and excuses, or if you'll do the mature thing and acknowledge the olive branch that has been repeatedly offered to you.
I have created the special thread for private communication with staff. Of several messages containing questions, answers to which are centrally important to me, thus far, Losty has superficially replied to, not answered, two questions I posed. So, Kevin, that is a false mode/avenue of communication with staff, they are too high and mighty to respond to me; and, that reminds me, I am, given the total irresponsible absence of response from the high and mighty ones, going to post the questions I asked on the open forum, right now, upon a second reply to your post.
Posts: 67288
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 11, 2018 at 8:55 pm
(This post was last modified: September 11, 2018 at 8:56 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
My son also used to throw fits whenever he didn't get his mashed bananas tut sweet. So I'm sure he knows how dejected and put upon you feel right now. Perhaps you'd like some animal crackers and a juicebox while you wait?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 11, 2018 at 8:59 pm
Negatio is the most painfully boring troll I have ever encountered here at AF.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 67288
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 11, 2018 at 9:01 pm
-and we haven't even cracked a hundo yet. Even with all the help he's been getting from so many well wishers.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 259
Threads: 1
Joined: August 20, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 11, 2018 at 9:05 pm
(September 11, 2018 at 3:59 pm)Bob Kelso Wrote: Are you actually mentally challenged or something? I’m truly wondering at this point, not even jokingly. You have both mods and long standing members telling you what is, and what isn’t, a rule in the forums.
Yet you’re still arguing. As if we don’t know what’s acceptable in our own stomping grounds. Jesus Christ, dude.
Sir, you are not going to successfully goad/insult me into a communication. The tone of the attempted communication is so sordid that I can see future communication would be unpleasant for me, because you clearly appear to be another member who cannot do otherwise that entail insult within an interchange. Your constant insulting train discourages and obviates future interpersonal dialogue. You will be condescending and unkind... Negatio.
Posts: 67288
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 11, 2018 at 9:06 pm
(This post was last modified: September 11, 2018 at 9:07 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
The train has no brakes. Are trains without breaks radically free to stop in their tracks?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 259
Threads: 1
Joined: August 20, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 11, 2018 at 9:15 pm
(This post was last modified: September 11, 2018 at 9:18 pm by negatio.)
(September 11, 2018 at 8:52 pm)negatio Wrote: (September 11, 2018 at 8:21 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Several people here - myself included - have given you actionable suggestions on how you can help yourself here. That includes:
Writing an introduction in the Introductions subsection
Engaging with staff in the Questions For Staff subsection instead of bickering/whining with/about them
Learning to competently use the forum software (including formatting posts so they're readable (an empty line between paragraphs))
Providing some background on your ideas, or places/authors/links where one can learn it on their own without insult
You keep claiming I'm mad or angry. I'm not. Annoyed perhaps, but nothing more. What I want to see is if you'll hang yourself with more refusals, weak justifications, and excuses, or if you'll do the mature thing and acknowledge the olive branch that has been repeatedly offered to you.
I have created the special thread for private communication with staff. Of several messages containing questions, answers to which are centrally important to me, thus far, Losty has superficially replied to, not answered, two questions I posed. So, Kevin, that is a false mode/avenue of communication with staff, they are too high and mighty to respond to me; and, that reminds me, I am, given the total irresponsible absence of response from the high and mighty ones, going to post the questions I asked on the open forum, right now, upon a second reply to your post. KevinM1 Wrote:
I am engaged in Replying. And, it seems you are continually calling Reply "Quoting"; so, one cannot really tell what on earth you are actually attempting to refer to. I thought Quoting was the earlier disaster when I was using the Quote tab, and inadvertently generating multi-quoting. Do you guys mean Reply when you say Quoting ? I think I am trying to learn how to properly Post Reply, not Quote!? So when you use two terms as synonyms, and, there is really a difference between the two, you are unintentionally both confusing, and, systematically misleading me!
(September 11, 2018 at 8:52 pm)negatio Wrote: (September 11, 2018 at 8:21 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Several people here - myself included - have given you actionable suggestions on how you can help yourself here. That includes:
Writing an introduction in the Introductions subsection
Engaging with staff in the Questions For Staff subsection instead of bickering/whining with/about them
Learning to competently use the forum software (including formatting posts so they're readable (an empty line between paragraphs))
Providing some background on your ideas, or places/authors/links where one can learn it on their own without insult
You keep claiming I'm mad or angry. I'm not. Annoyed perhaps, but nothing more. What I want to see is if you'll hang yourself with more refusals, weak justifications, and excuses, or if you'll do the mature thing and acknowledge the olive branch that has been repeatedly offered to you.
I have created the special thread for private communication with staff. Of several messages containing questions, answers to which are centrally important to me, thus far, Losty has superficially replied to, not answered, two questions I posed. So, Kevin, that is a false mode/avenue of communication with staff, they are too high and mighty to respond to me; and, that reminds me, I am, given the total irresponsible absence of response from the high and mighty ones, going to post the questions I asked on the open forum, right now, upon a second reply to your post.
You are addressing me in what is known as double-speak, confusing me by speaking simultaneously of one thing as another. Quoting is now something I am avoiding; I am trying to learn Reply(ing). Perhaps you do not realize that speaking to me in a double-speak is confusing. I thought, according to you Losty, that I was Replying correctly, and, now I am not "Quoting" correctly?! It appears you are whipsawing me with double-speak, I am sorry, but that is what it looks like...SHOW ME WHAT IS MISSING NOW IN MY CODING, IS IT SOMETHING AT EACH END OF WHAT I AM DOING NOW? DO NOT BE SO STRINGENT HERE THAT YOU WILL NOT SIMPLY SHOW ME THE PROPER EQUATION/CODE. Is this your way of trying to teach me something?
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 11, 2018 at 9:23 pm
It hurts. It physically hurts.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 5466
Threads: 36
Joined: November 10, 2014
Reputation:
53
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 11, 2018 at 9:32 pm
I dunno... there's a certain art to whining at me about the difference in replying vs. quoting when nothing in my previous post even directly mentioned it, and instead explicitly mentioned poorly formatted paragraphs
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Posts: 259
Threads: 1
Joined: August 20, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 11, 2018 at 9:39 pm
(September 11, 2018 at 9:32 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: I dunno... there's a certain art to whining at me about the difference in replying vs. quoting when nothing in my previous post even directly mentioned it, and instead explicitly mentioned poorly formatted paragraphs
No Kevin, that is the content of one of the private thread questions to staff; it is not meant for you, and there is another one there that I sent you, which mentions systematical misleadingness.
Negatio.
|