Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 2, 2026, 6:46 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ontological Disproof of God
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 11, 2018 at 11:11 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Dunno why it's not animating

It has to be hosted on an https server to be animated.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrp...pouidnfvtl]
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 11, 2018 at 11:15 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:
(September 11, 2018 at 11:11 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Dunno why it's not animating

It has to be hosted on an https server to be animated.

Ah.

That's what I get for simply direct linking GIS results
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
I called Khemikal a "cracker", i. e., I recognized his Southern USA personality to be a cracker personality/character type.  I have met many of the type while living in Kentucky, USA, for seven yeas now. "Cracker" is not a racial construct, though, as Khemikal has informed us, there are mulatto crackers,  a cracker is ordinarily white trash with an attitude. A male cracker is extraordinarily radically charming; sweet; polite; well mannered; and, above all, maintains a genuine beautifully smiling countenance.  He is just straight-up delightfully fun and pleasurable to be around. he drinks beer during summer and wisky in winter...

Then, watch out, he is going to pull some deeply chicken-shit bullshit, and, after his ignobility exhibits repeatedly, profoundly, one  finds one's self   under the necessity of cutting-off the association.  I have had them, later, man-up, and rectify their previous misconduct, and, remain fast friends thereafter. A cracker will, repeatedly, steal from his very own brother; come over to one's home, starving in winter when he cannot get work. One can repeatedly feed him steaks and eggs and beer when he is down and out; and, then, later on, when he is flush again, and, when you need just a little something, like a ride into town  he will say : "Everything costs, for $20 we can go to town." So, you decline...
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Why are you continually pushing things? Did you read the quotation FAQ I gave you in the other thread? I can’t really see any reasons why you’d be struggling with this, so my final conclusion is that you are entirely disingenuous in your reason for being here.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
No, I have not read whatever it is you sent me.  What does pushing things mean, nothing absent specific language, from you filling-in ''pushing things"can suffice for understanding of you language.

I have made it absolutely clear that I am here to overthrow ontological unintelligibility in law. You and others of your staff have come at me with law directed against my person, bringing philosophical discussion to an end upon my thread.  I am being wholly and entirely consistent with my original reason for being here.  You should not have pulled a chicken-shit bullshit bust on  me absent an open hearing and, in the Kafkaesque fashion which you have so inadvisedly, chosen to employ!  You have, very simply, radically angered me with a bullshit bust done merely for the sake of fucking with the newbie, who must, absolutely must, from your viewpoint, be a troll.


I am in process of describing the inconsistent and inauthentic manner in which staff is mediating forum law, because, you came at me with your law and destroyed a process of dialogical dialectic transpiring within the philosophy forum.  I was working as hard as possible to learn just one very important bit of BB code. I was a few too many spaces away from that accomplishment, so, instead of merely specifically informing me where there were too many absences present within my code, of which Losty was completely aware, you, instead, pulled a Kafka style bust on me. I am in process of accomplishing theoretical destruction of the forum's legal system, staff precipitated the present state of affair by stupidly coming at a man who has just posted a theoretical destruction of law upon your forum.  It may have been radically stupid of you  to poke a sleeping tiger, for, that seems to be precisely what you have done; you have affronted me, and, I can readily dismantle your Kafkaesque system of jurisprudence. You have provided me with a perfect laboratory for empirical experimentation in the destruction of unintelligible legal systems.  Do you begin to see what you have done ?
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 11, 2018 at 10:27 pm)negatio Wrote:
(September 11, 2018 at 10:09 pm)Bob Kelso Wrote: Dude, let me be perfectly clear. Your cold reception is one of your own making. You have done nothing but posit overly verbose crap, and refuse to rephrase it or condense it before expanding upon it (as an actual conversation would allow).

Not only that, but you continue to shit on our doorstep with your bitching, and narcissistic whining about the rules that you clearly don’t understand. People went out of their way to explain them, and instead of taking their word, both that of long standing members and actual goddamn moderators, for how things are done... you continue to preen and argue like a nut job.

If you don’t like it, and you clearly don’t what with the tens of pages long whining, then do yourself a favor and change your shit attitude. You will find that people wil actually engage with you if you do.

Fucking hell.



No, big daddy, you are mistaken, none of these people actually knew the rule in question existed, nor did, or do, know the content of the rule. Only Kit and KevinM1 knew, and their minds are the minds of what in law is called ''reasonable men'', they sent me the text of the rule, and, it is so simple that the meaning is unmistakable.
I am going to copy and paste to your post in a  minute or so via another reply. Duane

More dishonesty. Unlike you, I read the rules first before I ever posted. Unlike you, I spent some time simply reading other threads to learn the culture of the board. Unlike you, my first post was an intro thread.

So don't swagger in all high and mighty acting like some self important rules lawyer. You and you alone are the only participant who cannot figure the rule out.

(September 11, 2018 at 11:04 pm)negatio Wrote:
(September 11, 2018 at 10:57 pm)Losty Wrote: Emjay, I’m curious what your opinion is now that he’s spamming his own thread? Maybe not initially a troll but do you think he’s at least become a troll at this point?

Negatio, why are you signing my name at the end of your spam?



I just erased you name in one instance, I have no idea how your name got there !

It got there because either intentionally or accidentally, YOU PUT IT THERE.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Negatio,

https://atheistforums.org/forum-11.html

Sincerely,
A concerned forum member
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Gee, I wonder what "Whilist we are generally lenient of insulting language/rudeness in other forums" means and how it can be applied here, a forum not named Introductions...?
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The classic ontological argument Modern Atheism 20 5491 October 3, 2024 at 12:45 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The modal ontological argument for God Disagreeable 29 8183 August 10, 2024 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: MetisX
  My own moral + ontological argument. Mystic 37 20016 April 17, 2018 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: FatAndFaithless
  Ontological Limericks chimp3 12 5894 December 22, 2016 at 3:22 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument FallentoReason 7 4848 November 21, 2016 at 10:57 am
Last Post: FallentoReason
  How would you describe your ontological views? The Skeptic 10 5415 July 29, 2014 at 11:28 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Ontological Arguments - A Comprehensive Refutation MindForgedManacle 23 10535 March 20, 2014 at 1:48 am
Last Post: Rabb Allah
  The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic Rational AKD 82 52481 February 17, 2014 at 9:36 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  The modal ontological argument - without modal logic proves atheism max-greece 15 9740 February 14, 2014 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  The Ontological Argument MindForgedManacle 18 10021 August 22, 2013 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: Jackalope



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)