(September 11, 2018 at 11:11 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Dunno why it's not animating
It has to be hosted on an https server to be animated.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrp...pouidnfvtl]](https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/scl/fi/a6a72vica8gsyddmkhtxp/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg?rlkey=x1nmxbwrpk9dzrupouidnfvtl)
|
Ontological Disproof of God
|
(September 11, 2018 at 11:11 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Dunno why it's not animating It has to be hosted on an https server to be animated. ![]() (September 11, 2018 at 11:15 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(September 11, 2018 at 11:11 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Dunno why it's not animating Ah. That's what I get for simply direct linking GIS results
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 12, 2018 at 1:56 am
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2018 at 2:58 am by negatio.)
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 12, 2018 at 4:04 am
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2018 at 4:06 am by negatio.)
I called Khemikal a "cracker", i. e., I recognized his Southern USA personality to be a cracker personality/character type. I have met many of the type while living in Kentucky, USA, for seven yeas now. "Cracker" is not a racial construct, though, as Khemikal has informed us, there are mulatto crackers, a cracker is ordinarily white trash with an attitude. A male cracker is extraordinarily radically charming; sweet; polite; well mannered; and, above all, maintains a genuine beautifully smiling countenance. He is just straight-up delightfully fun and pleasurable to be around. he drinks beer during summer and wisky in winter...
Then, watch out, he is going to pull some deeply chicken-shit bullshit, and, after his ignobility exhibits repeatedly, profoundly, one finds one's self under the necessity of cutting-off the association. I have had them, later, man-up, and rectify their previous misconduct, and, remain fast friends thereafter. A cracker will, repeatedly, steal from his very own brother; come over to one's home, starving in winter when he cannot get work. One can repeatedly feed him steaks and eggs and beer when he is down and out; and, then, later on, when he is flush again, and, when you need just a little something, like a ride into town he will say : "Everything costs, for $20 we can go to town." So, you decline...
Why are you continually pushing things? Did you read the quotation FAQ I gave you in the other thread? I can’t really see any reasons why you’d be struggling with this, so my final conclusion is that you are entirely disingenuous in your reason for being here.
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 12, 2018 at 5:43 am
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2018 at 6:18 am by negatio.)
No, I have not read whatever it is you sent me. What does pushing things mean, nothing absent specific language, from you filling-in ''pushing things"can suffice for understanding of you language.
I have made it absolutely clear that I am here to overthrow ontological unintelligibility in law. You and others of your staff have come at me with law directed against my person, bringing philosophical discussion to an end upon my thread. I am being wholly and entirely consistent with my original reason for being here. You should not have pulled a chicken-shit bullshit bust on me absent an open hearing and, in the Kafkaesque fashion which you have so inadvisedly, chosen to employ! You have, very simply, radically angered me with a bullshit bust done merely for the sake of fucking with the newbie, who must, absolutely must, from your viewpoint, be a troll. I am in process of describing the inconsistent and inauthentic manner in which staff is mediating forum law, because, you came at me with your law and destroyed a process of dialogical dialectic transpiring within the philosophy forum. I was working as hard as possible to learn just one very important bit of BB code. I was a few too many spaces away from that accomplishment, so, instead of merely specifically informing me where there were too many absences present within my code, of which Losty was completely aware, you, instead, pulled a Kafka style bust on me. I am in process of accomplishing theoretical destruction of the forum's legal system, staff precipitated the present state of affair by stupidly coming at a man who has just posted a theoretical destruction of law upon your forum. It may have been radically stupid of you to poke a sleeping tiger, for, that seems to be precisely what you have done; you have affronted me, and, I can readily dismantle your Kafkaesque system of jurisprudence. You have provided me with a perfect laboratory for empirical experimentation in the destruction of unintelligible legal systems. Do you begin to see what you have done ? RE: Ontological Disproof of God
September 12, 2018 at 6:33 am
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2018 at 6:35 am by Abaddon_ire.)
(September 11, 2018 at 10:27 pm)negatio Wrote:(September 11, 2018 at 10:09 pm)Bob Kelso Wrote: Dude, let me be perfectly clear. Your cold reception is one of your own making. You have done nothing but posit overly verbose crap, and refuse to rephrase it or condense it before expanding upon it (as an actual conversation would allow). More dishonesty. Unlike you, I read the rules first before I ever posted. Unlike you, I spent some time simply reading other threads to learn the culture of the board. Unlike you, my first post was an intro thread. So don't swagger in all high and mighty acting like some self important rules lawyer. You and you alone are the only participant who cannot figure the rule out. (September 11, 2018 at 11:04 pm)negatio Wrote:(September 11, 2018 at 10:57 pm)Losty Wrote: Emjay, I’m curious what your opinion is now that he’s spamming his own thread? Maybe not initially a troll but do you think he’s at least become a troll at this point? It got there because either intentionally or accidentally, YOU PUT IT THERE.
Gee, I wonder what "Whilist we are generally lenient of insulting language/rudeness in other forums" means and how it can be applied here, a forum not named Introductions...?
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|