1. If you have heard our arguments and found them convincing, consider we have heard your rebuttals and found them unconvincing.

2. If we have the burden proof, you have the burden to accept the proof if proven to you or show that the burden has not been met.

3.  God by definition is the most important being, if an approach to this is made by jest and his scriptures approached with no seriousness, then whether he exists or not,  forgive Theists for seeing it irrational and evil to belittle what by definition most revered being in existence.

4. It won't ever make sense  that hating goodness for what is: is irrelevant to morality and hence, if goodness is God's light that hating that mystic link, would be hating for what it is at it's heart.

5. When we value beings, we value the value in them, if you hate value being linked to God, and value is linked to God, do you hate or love true value of things or do you just make up what value is and attribute to them...try to understand not only the issue of God existence is of vital importance then to love and appreciating and empathy, but that truly to act for the face of God in all things requires to recognize the face of God and his word of light brought to life.

6. I can't take your testification that you are honest and truly assess all evidence seriously - in light of how you guys have display an attitude to dialogue over the years. You chose to be silly. And hence, your testification has become meaningless to me as far as these issues go.

Your. Book. Is. Not. Proof.

Put. The. Crack. Pipe. Down.


Thank you very much. Have a nice day.

Quote: If you have heard our arguments and found them convincing,

But your arguments are bullshit and your god is a myth.

Now grow the fuck up.

(October 8, 2018 at 10:15 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Your. Book. Is. Not. Proof.

Dear LadyForCamus, does it make sense human books can contain proofs, but that a book from God cannot contain proofs?

Every verse in there is a proof, but you have to understand it, and if you can understand the verses which are signs of God and their place in the Surah and can understand the Surah and it's place in the Book, then the dark veil will be removed by God's permission.


It's not circular reasoning to believe God if he exists can prove everything he says and fabric and weave together a series of words, that interpret each other and all hold on to each other, and manifest one another, and that his book can be designed to be endless in knowledge, and that in time and with study and reflecting, a person can see that indeed it is beyond capability of a human.

And so whether Quran is that book or not, at least, acknowledge, that if God exists, he can prove things and not only that, but prove all that he speaks, and only speak things that are proofs of his and that will give insights through reflection.

He can bring about majestic wonders not only through physical miracles, but through words. This is a rational position.

You skipped a step.  First you need to demonstrate that your 'god' is not a figment of the imagination of camel fuckers.

Why does the creator of the universe have a tallywhacker?

(October 8, 2018 at 10:26 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:

(October 8, 2018 at 10:15 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Your. Book. Is. Not. Proof.

Dear LadyForCamus, does it make sense human books can contain proofs, but that a book from God cannot contain proofs?

Every verse in there is a proof, but you have to understand it, and if you can understand the verses which are signs of God and their place in the Surah and can understand the Surah and it's place in the Book, then the dark veil will be removed by God's permission.


It's not circular reasoning to believe God if he exists can prove everything he says and fabric and weave together a series of words, that interpret each other and all hold on to each other, and manifest one another, and that his book can be designed to be endless in knowledge, and that in time and with study and reflecting, a person can see that indeed it is beyond capability of a human.

And so whether Quran is that book or not, at least, acknowledge, that if God exists, he can prove things and not only that, but prove all that he speaks, and only speak things that are proofs of his and that will give insights through reflection.

He can bring about majestic wonders not only through physical miracles, but through words. This is a rational position.

Nope. Your argument is a giant, unsupported circle.  Always has been, and always will be.  I don’t believe in things argued for using fallacies, MK.

Silly religious. /thread

Seriously, do you think we are ever going to accept the stupid shit you and your xtian religious fellows on this site push? Do you even align you silly religious shit with their silly religious shit? What do you use for a reasoning organ? Your ass seems to be that organ. FFS.