Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 7:27 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Street Epistemology
#1
Street Epistemology
Has anyone seen this YouTube channel?  It’s called “Street Epistemology”.  I quite like it so far, so I thought I’d share!  Let me know what you think.

https://youtu.be/1RbpbWXg_Pw?list=PLh10R...t57oh_yL5r
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
#2
RE: Street Epistemology
Too cerebral. This is more my speed.





Talk about your valid justifiable street belief.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#3
RE: Street Epistemology
I prefer reading to watching.
Reply
#4
RE: Street Epistemology
I found these about a year or so ago, generally I really enjoy them, I'm fascinated by many of the answers (and questions).

When I was a theist and I got asked questions it was almost always in a religious setting like a church or rally I'm not sure how I would have got along just asked to justify my faith as I was walking around while doing my daily business or leisure. I admire people who are willing to openly chat about what they believe so openly.

Sometimes I feel the question's asked are a little unfair given the small amount of time they have to formulate an answer.

I might give this a try myself it would be great fun, though finding someone living their faith in any recognisable sense is much harder in the U.K.

What do you feel about them ?
'Those who ask a lot of questions may seem stupid, but those who don't ask questions stay stupid'
Reply
#5
RE: Street Epistemology
Anthony Magnabosco is amazing. I don't have 1/10th his patience.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
#6
RE: Street Epistemology
(October 20, 2018 at 7:26 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: Anthony Magnabosco is amazing. I don't have 1/10th his patience.

I see you're enjoying HZD.
Reply
#7
RE: Street Epistemology
Distinguishing true faith from deceiving hope, is not an easy task.

In Islam faith is to be built on proofs and signs from God, not on wishful thinking!

Thanks for the video and link to channel, I enjoyed it!
Reply
#8
RE: Street Epistemology
Notice that he always lies to them in the beginning?

Edit: Egads, how can you even listen to that?
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#9
RE: Street Epistemology
(October 20, 2018 at 6:45 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Has anyone seen this YouTube channel?  It’s called “Street Epistemology”.  I quite like it so far, so I thought I’d share!  Let me know what you think.

https://youtu.be/1RbpbWXg_Pw?list=PLh10R...t57oh_yL5r

...I believe because it's in the book, and the book tells me to have faith, and I know the book is true because I have faith...

<sigh> Circular reasoning is alive and well.
-- 
Dr H


"So, I became an anarchist, and all I got was this lousy T-shirt."
Reply
#10
RE: Street Epistemology
(October 20, 2018 at 6:45 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Has anyone seen this YouTube channel?  It’s called “Street Epistemology”.
...

If I remember correctly, Anthony Magnabosco was inspired to start this experiment after reading Peter Boghossian's A Manual for Creating Atheists around 5 years ago. He's now progressed to being an irregular co-host on e.g. The Atheist Experience.

We had a few talented proponents of this (Socratic) technique on TTA over the years. Sadly, the 'attack dogs' often drowned out those interactions which meant that believers became defensive (then aggressive) chew-toys - a freeze>fight>flight inevitability - and the caricature of the angry atheist was confirmed.

Watching Magnabosco's early attempts in comparison to his current capability is informative.
The PURPOSE of life is to replicate our DNA ................. (from Darwin)
The MEANING of life is the experience of living ... (from Frank Herbert)
The VALUE of life is the legacy we leave behind ..... (from observation)
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Plato's Epistemology: Is Faith a Valid Way to Know? vulcanlogician 10 1348 July 2, 2018 at 2:59 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Self-Validating Empirical Epistemology? Ignorant 69 7829 May 26, 2016 at 7:49 pm
Last Post: Ben Davis
  Properly basic beliefs. (Reformed Epistemology) theVOID 13 7539 December 29, 2010 at 4:24 pm
Last Post: Stempy
  What is your epistemology? theVOID 43 16605 September 14, 2010 at 11:25 pm
Last Post: ib.me.ub



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)