(December 15, 2018 at 2:11 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: You're delusional.  Atheism is an opinion. That's it. Nothing more than what the atheist enthusiasts do with their opinion. Go be an atheism is your home, go have churches like the theists do, or whatever.  But we don't need your nonsense forced on people anymore than anybody else's nonsense.  Be a friendly atheist, be an atheist who makes moral decisions, be an atheists who helps people, but don't be some nutjob atheist raging at the rest of the world who thinks differently or try to force anybody to join your cause against their will.  That's what happens when it gets injected into society.

Uhm...

 



 You keep using words that... do not seem to mean what you think they mean.

 Not at work.

(December 15, 2018 at 2:14 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote:

(December 15, 2018 at 2:11 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: You're delusional.  Atheism is an opinion. That's it. Nothing more than what the atheist enthusiasts do with their opinion. Go be an atheism is your home, go have churches like the theists do, or whatever.  But we don't need your nonsense forced on people anymore than anybody else's nonsense.  Be a friendly atheist, be an atheist who makes moral decisions, be an atheists who helps people, but don't be some nutjob atheist raging at the rest of the world who thinks differently or try to force anybody to join your cause against their will.  That's what happens when it gets injected into society.

Uhm...

 



 You keep using words that... do not seem to mean what you think they mean.

 Not at work.

Which word(s)?  If you're going to suggest something, own it.

(December 15, 2018 at 2:17 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: [quote pid='1868736' dateline='1544897674']
Which word(s)?  If you're going to suggest something, own it.

[/quote]

 Well.... most of your word usage seems... 'Off'.

Now, if Enlgish isn't your first languae? Hay that's cool!

Personally, I only know two languages. 'English' and 'Bad Enlgish'.

More power to you for learning stuff.

Not at work.

(December 15, 2018 at 2:24 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote:

(December 15, 2018 at 2:17 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: [quote pid='1868736' dateline='1544897674']
Which word(s)?  If you're going to suggest something, own it.

 Well.... most of your word usage seems... 'Off'.

Now, if Enlgish isn't your first languae? Hay that's cool!

Personally, I only know two languages. 'English' and 'Bad Enlgish'.

More power to you for learning stuff.

Not at work.
[/quote]

What word usage?  You seem to have a tendency towards making claims then not expanding on them enough so anybody knows what you're talking about.  So maybe provide an example.

(December 15, 2018 at 2:28 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: What word usage?  You seem to have a tendency towards making claims then not expanding on them enough so anybody knows what you're talking about.  So maybe provide an example.

[/quote]

 Hmmm. Perhaps it's a cultural divergence between our two countries, then?

 So, from your post that promted my fisrt reply.

  "You're delusional.  Atheism is an opinion. That's it. ..."

 *Nods* Yup, okay. That makes sense/Is understandable.


  "Nothing more than what the atheist enthusiasts do with their opinion."

 Okay, now we're getting... strange. You've changed how you use the word 'Atheist'. You've gone from using it as a label for how to think about something to using it to describe a group of people.

  "Go be an atheism is your home, ..."

 Which then devolves into a sentence that, really, doesn't make a lot of sense at all.

"Go and be an atheism" ?

 What? Then to add.

"Go and be an atheism is your home."

 I really have no idea how to parse this one. Maybe...

"Go and have our opinions/thoughts in your own space" ?

  "...Go have churches like the theists do, or whatever.  But we don't need your nonsense forced on people anymore than anybody else's nonsense."

 *Nods Okay, we're getting back into words placed together in a way that works.

"Go and... do things Theists do. But keep your thoughts to yourself. You (The Atheist) can't espouse your ideas because they are silly."

 Yup, that works. Seems a little.. arrogant, but hey, what ever.

"Be a friendly atheist, be an atheist who makes moral decisions, be an atheists who helps people, but don't be some nutjob atheist raging at the rest of the world who thinks differently or try to force anybody to join your cause against their will.  That's what happens when it gets injected into society."

 Where you've followed on with, pretty much, by more of the same rather rude, condescending words.

Basically, "Sit down, shut up. No one else (Which.. would be who, perchance?) wants to, or cares, about your silly ideas. Keep quiet. Be seen but not heard. Society (Which would be who, again?) doesn't want your sillyness out any where about the place. Stop getting your ideas every where."

 Am I coming across clearly in my postings/replies to you?

Not at work.

(December 15, 2018 at 2:45 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote:

(December 15, 2018 at 2:28 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: What word usage?  You seem to have a tendency towards making claims then not expanding on them enough so anybody knows what you're talking about.  So maybe provide an example.

 Hmmm. Perhaps it's a cultural divergence between our two countries, then?

 So, from your post that promted my fisrt reply.

  "You're delusional.  Atheism is an opinion. That's it. ..."

 *Nods* Yup, okay. That makes sense/Is understandable.


  "Nothing more than what the atheist enthusiasts do with their opinion."

 Okay, now we're getting... strange. You've changed how you use the word 'Atheist'. You've gone from using it as a label for how to think about something to using it to describe a group of people.

  "Go be an atheism is your home, ..."

 Which then devolves into a sentence that, really, doesn't make a lot of sense at all.

"Go and be an atheism" ?

 What? Then to add.

"Go and be an atheism is your home."

 I really have no idea how to parse this one. Maybe...

"Go and have our opinions/thoughts in your own space" ?

  "...Go have churches like the theists do, or whatever.  But we don't need your nonsense forced on people anymore than anybody else's nonsense."

 *Nods Okay, we're getting back into words placed together in a way that works.

"Go and... do things Theists do. But keep your thoughts to yourself. You (The Atheist) can't espouse your ideas because they are silly."

 Yup, that works. Seems a little.. arrogant, but hey, what ever.

"Be a friendly atheist, be an atheist who makes moral decisions, be an atheists who helps people, but don't be some nutjob atheist raging at the rest of the world who thinks differently or try to force anybody to join your cause against their will.  That's what happens when it gets injected into society."

 Where you've followed on with, pretty much, by more of the same rather rude, condescending words.

Basically, "Sit down, shut up. No one else (Which.. would be who, perchance?) wants to, or cares, about your silly ideas. Keep quiet. Be seen but not heard. Society (Which would be who, again?) doesn't want your sillyness out any where about the place. Stop getting your ideas every where."

 Am I coming across clearly in my postings/replies to you?

Not at work.
[/quote]

- "An atheism" was a typo.  Change "atheism" to "atheist" (I'll fix it in the original comment, but the discrepancy is noted)

Of course I changed the word usage because I'm talking about a different application.  Practice in private vs annoy people.

- I don't mind people who are atheists and practice whatever they believe (or disbelieve) peacefully without trying to impose it on anybody else.  I have disdain for those who bother others with it when those people don't want to be bothered, or the crackpots who insult everybody while claiming they're "more logical."  Friendly atheists = Cool with me.  Raging nutjob atheists = disease.  It's not the atheist part, but rather what they choose to do with it.

(December 15, 2018 at 3:00 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: - "An atheism" was a typo.  Change "atheism" to "atheist" (I'll fix it in the original comment, but the discrepancy is noted)

Of course I changed the word usage because I'm talking about a different application.  Practice in private vs annoy people.

- I don't mind people who are atheists and practice whatever they believe (or disbelieve) peacefully without trying to impose it on anybody else.  I have disdain for those who bother others with it when those people don't want to be bothered, or the crackpots who insult everybody while claiming they're "more logical."  Friendly atheists = Cool with me.  Raging nutjob atheists = disease.  It's not the atheist part, but rather what they choose to do with it.

  Okay, cool.

Yah, my fingers aren't as nimble skipping across the keyboard as they used to be.

So... basically... Atheists should be seen and not heard. Sit down, shut up.

Rather arrogant wouldn't you say, hey what?

Also, you are posting such coimment in a forum that's.... a gathering place of athiets?


Not at work.

(December 15, 2018 at 3:23 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote:

(December 15, 2018 at 3:00 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: - "An atheism" was a typo.  Change "atheism" to "atheist" (I'll fix it in the original comment, but the discrepancy is noted)

Of course I changed the word usage because I'm talking about a different application.  Practice in private vs annoy people.

- I don't mind people who are atheists and practice whatever they believe (or disbelieve) peacefully without trying to impose it on anybody else.  I have disdain for those who bother others with it when those people don't want to be bothered, or the crackpots who insult everybody while claiming they're "more logical."  Friendly atheists = Cool with me.  Raging nutjob atheists = disease.  It's not the atheist part, but rather what they choose to do with it.

  Okay, cool.

Yah, my fingers aren't as nimble skipping across the keyboard as they used to be.

So... basically... Atheists should be seen and not heard. Sit down, shut up.

Rather arrogant wouldn't you say, hey what?

Also, you are posting such coimment in a forum that's.... a gathering place of athiets?


Not at work.

I make typos sometimes.  Wasn't the first, and won't be the last.

It's not so much that I would like for them to sit down and shut up, but rather not going around demonstrating and insulting other people.  If someone is friendly, then IMO they're as good as the next person, but if they're screeching at everybody else and nonstop insults, then it's annoying.  I get that they don't want to believe in something, but other people choose to.  Why can't those people do it peacefully?  I don't like when theists do it as well.  Share if someone wants you to share, and if not, leave them alone.

Gae Bolga Wrote:You're still fielding a sprawling and ridiculous incel complaint rather than any theory on the origins of religion or civ.  That's why -I- called it the chad theory, the only name it would have in academia is "Garbage".

I had to look up the definition of this term “incel”. Seems to be so many new age terms always being made.
“who define themselves as unable to find a romantic or sexual partner despite desiring one, a state they describe as inceldom”
My 15yo knew what a “chad” was but had never heard of “incel”
If u must know about my personal life. Im 41yo, married with kids.
I don’t mind to know ur personal life, why… Because I’m not bias. It makes no difference

I thought u might be logical but u fail by committing the worse logical fallacy of all in my opinion. Ad Hominem. “ur an incel therefore ur thoughts are void”. If I was an incel u would merely be attacking the man and ignoring the facts.

Human nature. One of the problems with socialism is that it fails to a knowledge human nature. Human nature is a branch of psychology. Dismissed on a fallacy.
Observations of societies in animals. Biology, ecology, society and several other branches of science. All dismissed.
Attempted look at war and its possible part in human development. Dismissed.
Thoughts which aren’t in line with his, are fallaciously dismissed

In conclusion its obvious that u harbour some very deep feelings, beliefs and prejudices. U hold ur beliefs in such high regard that u attack whoever challenges it, usually theists. In my case u found another label. The fact that its false bares little relevance.
So its only fair for me now to dismiss GaeB arguments, beliefs and even thoughts as heavily bias. Suspected motivation I think is the thought that civilization was not possible without religion. That thought terrifies u even more than the thought of God. U will not allow that thought to be entertained by anybody. Very Richard Dawkins like. Dawky is what I'll call u if I ever feel the need to respond to u which I doubt. Though Dawky is a good nickname. I like it. LoL



Im just noticing there are some voices of reason and truth up in here, up in here. People have thought about this logically. They’re also being suppressed I see.
My apologies. Still learning who is who. I thought everyone was a one eyed atheists in here. Im going through the posts now... I will be engaging





     FACTS. TRUTH. KNOWLEDGE. UP IN HERE
Im excited as this Lama in learning there are rational people up in here, up in here

Quote:had to look up the definition of this term “incel”. Seems to be so many new age terms always being made.
“who define themselves as unable to find a romantic or sexual partner despite desiring one, a state they describe as inceldom”
My 15yo knew what a “chad” was but had never heard of “incel”
If u must know about my personal life. Im 41yo, married with kids.
I don’t mind to know ur personal life, why… Because I’m not bias. It makes no difference

I thought u might be logical but u fail by committing the worse logical fallacy of all in my opinion. Ad Hominem. “ur an incel therefore ur thoughts are void”. If I was an incel u would merely be attacking the man and ignoring the facts.

Human nature. One of the problems with socialism is that it fails to a knowledge human nature. Human nature is a branch of psychology. Dismissed on a fallacy.
Observations of societies in animals. Biology, ecology, society and several other branches of science. All dismissed.
Attempted look at war and its possible part in human development. Dismissed.
Thoughts which aren’t in line with his, are fallaciously dismissed

In conclusion its obvious that u harbour some very deep feelings, beliefs and prejudices. U hold ur beliefs in such high regard that u attack whoever challenges it, usually theists. In my case u found another label. The fact that its false bares little relevance.
So its only fair for me now to dismiss GaeB arguments, beliefs and even thoughts as heavily bias. Suspected motivation I think is the thought that civilization was not possible without religion. That thought terrifies u even more than the thought of God. U will not allow that thought to be entertained by anybody. Very Richard Dawkins like. Dawky is what I'll call u if I ever feel the need to respond to u which I doubt. Though Dawky is a good nickname. I like it. LoL



Im just noticing there are some voices of reason and truth up in here, up in here. People have thought about this logically. They’re also being suppressed I see.
My apologies. Still learning who is who. I thought everyone was a one eyed atheists in here. Im going through the posts now... I will be engaging

So a long rambling heap of no points and fallacies and accusations supported by nothing but your own confidence as a mind reader .

---

Quote: Historically?  The Soviet Union, Cambodia, Cuba, China, Albania, Vietnam, N. Korea, etc...

Nope Atheism was never forced in those countries