Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 2, 2026, 4:40 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How about this..
#51
RE: How about this..
(July 30, 2019 at 11:09 am)Drich Wrote:
(July 30, 2019 at 2:54 am)Deesse23 Wrote: You are the village idiot. Mathilda has already made a nice summary of what has happened here and the lunacy you are engaged in here. 

I do not have the time nor the interest of engaging erratic village idiots in serious conversation. You are no threat, teacher or challenge, you are a punching ball. I punch the ball when i feel i want to, i do not argue with it.

You arent happy with not being taken serious? Stop being erratic, stop lying, stop strwamanning, stop your oh-so-transparent over inflation of yourself. You know, smart people can pretend to be stupid, you are trying it the other way around. Stop being a dick, start being a (somewhat) decent poster. I do not have to like the people i am engaging in discourse, but i have to respect them. You have done pretty much nothing to warrant my respect, its quite the other way around. I dont even have a problem with the ignorant, but with those who like to stay ignorant.

again you are still proving me correct. I asked you twice for your personal expert analysis as an engineer and you have failed both time rather defaulting to name calling and ad hoc personal attacks. Even after I showed you how predictable you all where here you are the only one who still does not understand how you were just outed by me. i can not believe non of your peers has trying to help you yet. them must also think very poorly of you if they let you just keep going on and on about a subject they have all left 3 threads back.

(July 30, 2019 at 11:09 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: None of those are correct.  Would you like to have another go?

Boru


If you have any exegetical knowledge then please do share with proper references. otherwise final answer.

The twelve Disciples chose by Jesus were Nephi, Timothy, Jonas, Mathony, Mathoninah, Kumen, Kumenonhi, Jeremiah, Shemnon, another Jonas, Zedekiah, and Isaiah. 

Reference:  3 Nephi 28

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#52
RE: How about this..
Jesus overlooked Larry, Curley and Moe.
Reply
#53
RE: How about this..
(July 30, 2019 at 11:28 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: Jesus overlooked Larry, Curley and Moe.

Not entirely.  Peloponnesians 13:12 'And the Lord did call unto him Jerome and saith, "Thou shalt be called Curly" and it was so.'

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#54
RE: How about this..
(July 30, 2019 at 11:09 am)Drich Wrote: again you are still proving me correct. I asked you twice for your personal expert analysis as an engineer and you have failed both time rather defaulting to name calling and ad hoc personal attacks. Even after I showed you how predictable you all where here you are the only one who still does not understand how you were just outed by me. i can not believe non of your peers has trying to help you yet. them must also think very poorly of you if they let you just keep going on and on about a subject they have all left 3 threads back.
When i fell like punching the ball, ill let you know. Otherwise there is no point in civil interaction with a fool like you. Call me when you are ready to drop your cheap and silly bluffs and actually learn something. I dont have to prove anything. Cuz, ya know, its all documented on this board. Your ignorance, your lies, your unwarranted grandiosity.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply
#55
RE: How about this..
Reply
#56
RE: How about this..
(July 30, 2019 at 12:19 pm)Drich Wrote: which has taken a back seat to 4 quests by me for you to explain how the 2nd law of thermal dynamics does not apply to my machine


Absolutely no one has said that the second law of thermodynamics does not apply to your proposed machine.

On the contrary, people have said that your machine is not a perpetual motion machine precisely because the second law of thermodynamics applies to it.

As it does to absolutely everything else ever known about.

This has been repeatedly explained to you but for some reason you are not capable of understanding this.
Reply
#57
RE: How about this..
(July 30, 2019 at 1:21 pm)Mathilda Wrote:
(July 30, 2019 at 12:19 pm)Drich Wrote: which has taken a back seat to 4 quests by me for you to explain how the 2nd law of thermal dynamics does not apply to my machine


Absolutely no one has said that the second law of thermodynamics does not apply to your proposed machine.

On the contrary, people have said that your machine is not a perpetual motion machine precisely because the second law of thermodynamics applies to it.

As it does to absolutely everything else ever known about.

This has been repeatedly explained to you but for some reason you are not capable of understanding this.

What has been explained is what I revealed my self in the "So what happened" thread post number 207.

Because the second law does not apply EG I am not breaking the second law then all arguments or understanding you have to bring the 2nd law up are moot!/over/non existent!!! Do you understand you can not argue I am not breaking the law if I myself do not say that I am!! (which is what you are trying to do to save face)

Yes yes i get what you are saying people are telling me it is not perpetual motion because I'm not breaking the second law... the problem you can not explain how. not once ever in one of your post have you been able to explain this. Why? because no matter how many times I explain it you do not understand to correlation between the second law and what my machine does use to perpetuate motion. that is how and why I can point to your argument and tell you and everyone else you do not know what you are talking about that you read a wiki page that told you PMM's can not exist other wise the would break the second law.. that is all you been harping on this whole time. you think that has saved you when in fact it condemns you further.

 what's worse.. I bet you don't understand why a pmm can not exist, otherwise this conversation would be pointed at what does indeed perpetuates motion indefinitely in this machine and that is FUEL!!! Once you say fuel the argument is over. yet you are still not smart enough to point this out no matter how many times i point to the literal definition and tell you why my pmm does not work as a pmm! 

so yeah you and desees keep harping the 2nd law, as this will be your proof that I am the dummy here and you where right all along.
Reply
#58
RE: How about this..
Lmao. Unconditional surrender Drich...
Reply
#59
RE: How about this..
Reply
#60
RE: How about this..
(July 30, 2019 at 2:02 pm)Drich Wrote: so yeah you and desees keep harping the 2nd law
I mentioned the second law of thermal  Razz   erm thermodynamics exactly once, namely in this post:

https://atheistforums.org/thread-59309-p...pid1921513

Do you have problems with what i said in this post? If so, please explain.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)