Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 3, 2024, 1:59 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
#21
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 28, 2023 at 5:38 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Boring.  Fuck your p values, I wanna hear some more war crime denials.

I'd like to know more about the p-values of non-existent prisons.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#22
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 27, 2023 at 6:33 pm)GrandizerII Wrote:
(August 27, 2023 at 5:40 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: No, I don't see it. Do you agree with me that somebody who says "Fuck off with those p-values, go to Alternativa with them!" both has a mistaken picture of how modern science works and is being a jerk? If not, have you watched the Veritasium's video about why most published research is wrong (explaining how modern science revolves around p-values and what are the upsides and downsides of that)?

What's the context? I feel like there was a lot of things going on in the exchange between you and them that eventually led to this kind of response.
Well, if I remember correctly, that was after he told me "Nobody in mainstream onomastics even mentions p-values. That alone should have made you think." and I responded with "If nobody mentions p-values there, that in the best case means that it is a very soft science, and it probably means it is a pseudoscience.".
Reply
#23
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 28, 2023 at 5:38 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Boring.  Fuck your p values, I wanna hear some more war crime denials.

If war crimes are real, they are a failure of gun control. Vukovar Massacre and Varivode Massacre couldn't have happened if the civilians had been armed.
Reply
#24
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 28, 2023 at 7:38 am)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(August 28, 2023 at 5:38 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Boring.  Fuck your p values, I wanna hear some more war crime denials.

If war crimes are real, they are a failure of gun control. Vukovar Massacre and Varivode Massacre couldn't have happened if the civilians had been armed.

Right, because civilians with pistols and hunting rifles have historically done SO well against professional soldiers with automatic weapons, air support, and artillery.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#25
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 28, 2023 at 7:43 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(August 28, 2023 at 7:38 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: If war crimes are real, they are a failure of gun control. Vukovar Massacre and Varivode Massacre couldn't have happened if the civilians had been armed.

Right, because civilians with pistols and hunting rifles have historically done SO well against professional soldiers with automatic weapons, air support, and artillery.

Boru

Vukovar Massacre was committed by an illegal army, which probably didn't include many professional soldiers (though I haven't checked that). We don't know who committed the Varivode Massacre, but they probably weren't professional soldiers either.
Reply
#26
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 28, 2023 at 7:38 am)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(August 28, 2023 at 5:38 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Boring.  Fuck your p values, I wanna hear some more war crime denials.

If war crimes are real, they are a failure of gun control. Vukovar Massacre and Varivode Massacre couldn't have happened if the civilians had been armed.

Gun Control am Evil. Got it.
Reply
#27
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 28, 2023 at 7:38 am)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(August 28, 2023 at 5:38 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: Boring.  Fuck your p values, I wanna hear some more war crime denials.

If war crimes are real, they are a failure of gun control. Vukovar Massacre and Varivode Massacre couldn't have happened if the civilians had been armed.

Yeah, because armed civilians can't possibly lead to daily mass shootings. Dodgy
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
#28
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 28, 2023 at 9:49 am)Ravenshire Wrote:
(August 28, 2023 at 7:38 am)FlatAssembler Wrote: If war crimes are real, they are a failure of gun control. Vukovar Massacre and Varivode Massacre couldn't have happened if the civilians had been armed.

Yeah, because armed civilians can't possibly lead to daily mass shootings. Dodgy

Aha, so, the only reason you are not a mass-shooter is because gun control makes it more difficult to get a gun?

How do you explain the fact that Switzerland, a country where the government gives a gun to every male at the age between 18 and 65, doesn't have a lot of mass shootings?

How do you explain the fact that most mass shootings happen in gun-free zones?
Reply
#29
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
(August 28, 2023 at 10:58 am)FlatAssembler Wrote:
(August 28, 2023 at 9:49 am)Ravenshire Wrote: Yeah, because armed civilians can't possibly lead to daily mass shootings. Dodgy

Aha, so, the only reason you are not a mass-shooter is because gun control makes it more difficult to get a gun?

How do you explain the fact that Switzerland, a country where the government gives a gun to every male at the age between 18 and 65, doesn't have a lot of mass shootings?

How do you explain the fact that most mass shootings happen in gun-free zones?

If there is a shooting it's obviously not happening somewhere that really gun-free now is it?

Also, many of these mass shooters pick places where the likelihood of being shot is extremely low - elementary schools, churches, long-distance sniper shoooting.
[Image: MmQV79M.png]  
                                      
Reply
#30
RE: Does reading a lot of Wikipedia give people a wrong idea how science works?
The UK is mostly gun free, the last mass shooting here was at Dunblane in 1996, after that the rules were tightened up a lot.
The meek shall inherit the Earth, the rest of us will fly to the stars.

Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud ..... after a while you realise that the pig likes it!

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Google's Mobile-Friendly Test Driving Me Batty: What am I Doing Wrong? Rhondazvous 10 3132 August 14, 2015 at 12:05 pm
Last Post: Longhorn
  Reading redefined! Napoléon 31 4069 April 18, 2014 at 7:15 pm
Last Post: NoraBrimstone
  Please give me link voting english website A-g-n-o-s-t-i-c 4 1744 December 24, 2013 at 2:29 am
Last Post: A-g-n-o-s-t-i-c
  Idea for a service / business. Tiberius 3 1462 April 27, 2012 at 5:17 am
Last Post: frankiej
  Prof. Alan Woodward is Wrong; The Internet is Fine Tiberius 14 5828 March 15, 2012 at 4:49 pm
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)