If you look closely at the background in Arcade's video short, you'll see this flag in the background.  It's the Objectum Pride flag.  So now if you see it at a Pride event, or on someone's lapel, or wherever, you'll know what it means:

I mean.....I have a small thing going on with what I believe is a tulpa, but a tulpa isn't an object. Not sure how to classify it.

(November 2, 2023 at 11:14 am)Ahriman Wrote: I mean.....I have a small thing going on with what I believe is a tulpa, but a tulpa isn't an object. Not sure how to classify it.

Objectum sexual also cover concepts/abstract inorganic, so the number 6 or a sunset. And fictosexual also cover your own fictional creations. So one of those would likely fit. If you want to identify that way.

How do I bring Her into the organic realm?

(November 2, 2023 at 11:33 am)Ahriman Wrote: How do I bring Her into the organic realm?

Read some Mary Shelly.

(November 2, 2023 at 11:33 am)Ahriman Wrote: How do I bring Her into the organic realm?

I doubt that is possible.
You can, however, find a doll that embodies her and let that 'vessel' be 'possessed' by her.

I think this is all placebo magick and imagination. It can be quite satisfying, though.

Quote: At some point your POV and language will be seen by the majority as queerphobic, until then I guess you have freedom to express your distaste of this non-harmful, non-illegal sexual minority however you wish.

No, it won't it will be seen as totally reasonable because it is. My statements have nothing to do with a distaste for a said minority or any belief they are harmful it's simply the fact these people hold a false and irrational idea it's no different to me criticizing any other belief in that category.

What false and irrational idea?

You seem to have said much more than that they simply hold to a belief you consider false.

I mean, do you say religious people all need therapy?

If you're willing, I'd be interested to know your thinking behind:

A) What false and irrational idea all OS hold to?
B) Why all OS need therapy?
C) Why OS is not a sexuality?
D) Why OS does not belong to the queer umbrella along with asexuality and bisexuality etc?

Quote:What false and irrational idea?

The idea of loving a concept or an inanimate object simply isn't something some can do rationally. 

Quote:You seem to have said much more than that they simply hold to a belief you consider false.

For example? 

Quote:I mean, do you say religious people all need therapy?

Some do others are beyond anything therapy could do for them 

Quote:If you're willing, I'd be interested to know your thinking behind:

A) What false and irrational idea all OS hold to?

The idea you can love an non-entity is irrational 

Quote:B) Why all OS need therapy?

For the same reason many religious people do 

Quote:C) Why OS is not a sexuality?

Sexuality is always in relation to entities even Asexuality 

Quote:D) Why OS does not belong to the queer umbrella along with asexuality and bisexuality etc?

Both still relate to entities OS does not.

So your case seems to be built on three arguable premises:

A) Love is an idea.
B) Sexuality is always in relation to conscious entities
C) All false ideas, like belief in God, require therapy

Can you expand on these please, because I don't find any of them self-evident.