^Unsolicited advice to SubtleVirtue: I have learned (the hard way) not to fuck with Angrboda on questions of philosophy. Proceed at your own risk.

Boru

(June 5, 2025 at 10:12 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote: I have to ask, are you a human being?

I think so.

(June 5, 2025 at 11:51 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Yet you're not even intelligent enough to read the rules. How smart are you, really?

question to the admin; If I can't quote my proof nor link to my proof how exactly will we debate it?

(June 5, 2025 at 11:52 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: They appear to have been posted by somebody who was more interested in winning internet arguments than anything sincere.

I can have fun and be sincere at the same time.

(June 6, 2025 at 4:21 pm)SubtleVirtue Wrote:

(June 5, 2025 at 11:51 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Yet you're not even intelligent enough to read the rules. How smart are you, really?

question to the admin; If I can't quote my proof nor link to my proof how exactly will we debate it?

The rule is no external links for 30 days and 30 posts.  

Try a conversation instead of posting a dissertation.

(June 6, 2025 at 12:37 am)Astreja Wrote: "Proofs" are useless to me.  Show. Me. The. Actual. God.

If I showed you the actual God... that would be observational proof.

here I will show you

open your eyes

look all around

there you have it!

(June 6, 2025 at 4:25 pm)arewethereyet Wrote:

(June 6, 2025 at 4:21 pm)SubtleVirtue Wrote: question to the admin; If I can't quote my proof nor link to my proof how exactly will we debate it?

The rule is no external links for 30 days and 30 posts.  

Try a conversation instead of posting a dissertation.

ok thanks

(June 6, 2025 at 4:26 pm)SubtleVirtue Wrote:

(June 6, 2025 at 12:37 am)Astreja Wrote: "Proofs" are useless to me.  Show. Me. The. Actual. God.

If I showed you the actual God... that would be observational proof.

here I will show you

open your eyes

look all around

there you have it!

Wow, that's stunning.  In a not very convincing kinda way.

(June 6, 2025 at 12:22 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: If this is regarding your proof from observation, it seems to be a string of assertions followed by a loosely-connected conclusion. You should get rid of any premises not needed to reach the conclusion.

For instance 'monism exists' doesn't seem to add anything to the argument. If you were trying to assert that monism is the case and dualism is not, that ought to be the conclusion of a different argument. And I say that as a monist.

(10) F; "energy exists"
(11) F; "every experiment ever constructed shows that everything is made of energy"
(12) (10,11) C; "monism exists"


12 is a natural deduction from 10 and 11

The reason I prove monism... is to demonstrate there is but one supreme God.

(June 6, 2025 at 1:36 pm)Angrboda Wrote: I found things wrong with your argument.  What's in it for me if I tell you?  Shall I PM my Paypal info?

What's in it for you... you can go down in history as the mighty atheist who PWND what seems like a stream of invincible proofs provided by the smartest people in the world.