(August 20, 2009 at 12:22 pm)kittenshere Wrote: kyuu did you understand dont listen if you are uninterested? or it that to complicated for ya to comprehend?

And did YOU understand that I DON'T TAKE ORDERS FROM MORONS! I will do as I wish in an ATHEIST forum, one where YOU are the interloper!

Apparently I don't need to ask if you are too fucking stupid to understand that!

Kyu

I was wondering when someone from my state of "Louisiana" would post on here.

Kitten, as much as it's nice to know that you disregard the portion of a "Hell" within the Bible, you simply cherry picked the rest and held it as truth of your own opinionated ideas.

In saying that, do you not realize how plagiarized/passed down and changed the Bible is? It's one thing to believe in a "God", but it's an entire other to follow a book which has already been shown time and time again to be full of contradictions and has the moral outlook that would make Hitler look kind hearted and generous.

The archeological statements you speak of in trying to defend your book is nothing more than simple findings that were written about from others far before the word "Christian" or "Catholic" or most importantly "Bible" was put into place as a word period.

Of course the writers would come closer to knowing certain historical events or locations the closer they got to their own time period. But just because someone wrote of a city called "Babylon" and we proved it existed, doesn't make them correct on everything they wrote. Also keep in mind that most of the cities throughout the Bible still are around today, so why wouldn't they have that part correct.

What about the cities they speak of in which there are no archeological evidence for and have more evidence pointing towards an Atlantis myth than being a real city? That would be called cherry picking scripture and it's already apparent that you do this, by your choice of excluding a hell.

Like I stated before....It's one thing to believe in a "God", but another to believe in the "Bible"....You need to truly do more research on the book you hold so dear to your belief.

thank you adrian for your words. Now please go do what it is you want to do. Im not making you discuss God. Im not asking you to change who you are. Im not here to cause anyone to belive in God. If you dont then so be it. I came for the ones that do not quetsion his existance but walked away becuase of false teachings. Alnd they do exist. If it isnt you then im obviosuly not looking for you.

---

samson siad, Like I stated before....It's one thing to believe in a "God", but another to believe in the "Bible"....You need to truly do more research on the book you hold so dear to your belief.

WHY? just becuase you dont believe in it? well thats just not a good enough reason for me. no offense

samson siad, What about the cities they speak of in which there are no archeological evidence for and have more evidence pointing towards an Atlantis myth than being a real city?

Whether an archeologicalist have found evidence or not YET does not mean they wont in the future.

13 pages and still no ex-christians begging you to teach them your kooky new view of the bible. Hmm, maybe they just haven't logged on...

Just so you know, every time a thread has a new post in it, the "unread post" halo goes up around the topic. I think we all go see what was written so no matter who you are trying to reach, we will all be able to read what is written. The fun part is that the more you try to get us to ignore you, the more attention you will draw.

I find your broken worldview even more interesting than The_Truth's, because at least he realizes where he is, so his comprhension of the situation is less laughably distant from reality than yours.

Cheers,
Rhizo

Quote:Whether an archeologicalist have found evidence or not YET does not mean they wont in the future.

That is the single silliest thing you have said yet.


What about situations where archaeologists have dug in Jerusalem and found evidence for a miserable little shithole of a village in the 10th century? No great and glorious capital of a far-flung empire. A one-horse town of perhaps 500-1,000 people clinging to a poverty-ridden existence in a region with a total population of perhaps 20,000 (mainly) pastoralists following their sheep and goats around and kicking the shit off their feet.

There is NO absence of evidence about Jerusalem. The evidence is that your fucking bible is a fairy tale...much like the Arthurian legends which added 11th century castles and chivalry onto, at best, a 5th century tale of barbarians overrunning an abandoned portion of the Roman empire.

(August 20, 2009 at 2:14 pm)kittenshere Wrote: Frodo there is no such thing as trinity. its not biblical. it is man made crap. I coudl say me and my daughter worked on a project together but that doesnt mean we are one person, we are two separate people working on the project. Just as God and Jesus work on the same GOAL but are two seperate beings.

Here's why L. Ray Smith is wrong kitty: http://www.tektonics.org/qt/smithlr02.html

I think you should describe yourself better. 'Non denominational' implies mainstream Christian. You couldn't be further from mainstream OR Christian. Have some honesty.

(August 20, 2009 at 3:52 pm)kittenshere Wrote: thank you adrian for your words. Now please go do what it is you want to do. Im not making you discuss God. Im not asking you to change who you are. Im not here to cause anyone to belive in God. If you dont then so be it. I came for the ones that do not quetsion his existance but walked away becuase of false teachings. Alnd they do exist. If it isnt you then im obviosuly not looking for you.

Some would say you're an idiot for coming to a forum full of hardened atheists where your only possible converts are those who already believe and I strongly suspect they think rather poorly of you too (apart, possibly, from a bit of sympathy for the way you've been set on by an angry atheist)!

Kyu

(August 20, 2009 at 1:01 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Kitten,

Yes, just because someone thinks something is stupid does not make it so, indeed.

And just because you think atheists are 'filled with hate' as you say, that doesn't make it so. Atheists can be good people just as much as any non-atheists can (be it theist, deist or whatever).

EvF

Im going by what they have shown me here. maybe I should have said SOME atheist. the proof is in how they are treating me.

---

(August 20, 2009 at 3:01 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:

(August 20, 2009 at 12:22 pm)kittenshere Wrote: kyuu did you understand dont listen if you are uninterested? or it that to complicated for ya to comprehend?

And did YOU understand that I DON'T TAKE ORDERS FROM MORONS! I will do as I wish in an ATHEIST forum, one where YOU are the interloper!

Apparently I don't need to ask if you are too fucking stupid to understand that!

Kyu

I dont see a moron giving you orders. In fact, I dont see anyone giving you orders at all. And no one here in the forum is a moron. What we are is humans with different views. thats it. If you are trying to offend me with rudeness, you will always be a failure at doing so.

No human is better than any other. we are all sinners. period.

(August 20, 2009 at 5:07 pm)kittenshere Wrote:

(August 20, 2009 at 3:01 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: And did YOU understand that I DON'T TAKE ORDERS FROM MORONS! I will do as I wish in an ATHEIST forum, one where YOU are the interloper! Apparently I don't need to ask if you are too fucking stupid to understand that!

I dont see a moron giving you orders. In fact, I dont see anyone giving you orders at all. And no one here in the forum is a moron. What we are is humans with different views. thats it. If you are trying to offend me with rudeness, you will always be a failure at doing so.

I do because she is so fucking insistent that I ignore here ... amounts to the same thing!

(August 20, 2009 at 3:01 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: No human is better than any other. we are all sinners. period.

In principle yes but I consider myself better than you because you lack any form of objectivity (your pride in only trusting one site, one very biased site apparently, is evidence of that.

I am not a sinner ... the concept of sin is inherently religious and relies on the existence of an ultimate arbiter (a god or similar) to decide what is what is not a sin. Neither you nor any other has ever successfully demonstrated the existence of this god therefore the concept of sin can be discarded ... I don't believe in your god (in part because because there is no validatable evidence for it) or any other therefore I cannot sin.

Kyu

kyuu unfortunately God dont see you through your eyes. he sees you through his own. I know you dont belive in God yet. but one day you will and it will not be your choice. You control notihng.. God controls all.