(March 23, 2012 at 6:25 pm)Dreck Wrote: We have explored my willingness to open and research the bible, what say you? (as the golden rule is a biblical precept)

The 'golden rule" was only ripped off and put in the babble. An atheist espoused a far more detailed and profound ethics of reciprocity some 600 years before your mythical Jeebus. Of course, an arrogant xtard like you wouldn't have a clue about it, though.

Well well well, fancy seeing you here stuka.

P.s. Phil has been put in the Gauntlet for name calling and such. So take my advice and tone it down

(May 26, 2012 at 10:12 pm)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:

(March 23, 2012 at 6:25 pm)Dreck Wrote: We have explored my willingness to open and research the bible, what say you? (as the golden rule is a biblical precept)

The 'golden rule" was only ripped off and put in the babble. An atheist espoused a far more detailed and profound ethics of reciprocity some 600 years before your mythical Jeebus. Of course, an arrogant xtard like you wouldn't have a clue about it, though.

The Egyptians and the Babylonians both had a version of the ethic of reciprocity at least a thousand years before the Greeks.

BTW, Howdy Stuk!

(May 26, 2012 at 10:23 pm)FallentoReason Wrote: Well well well,blah blah blah...

When I need your advice I'll beat it out of you.

---

(May 26, 2012 at 10:24 pm)popeyespappy Wrote:

(May 26, 2012 at 10:12 pm)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: The 'golden rule" was only ripped off and put in the babble. An atheist espoused a far more detailed and profound ethics of reciprocity some 600 years before your mythical Jeebus. Of course, an arrogant xtard like you wouldn't have a clue about it, though.

The Egyptians and the Babylonians both had a version of the ethic of reciprocity at least a thousand years before the Greeks.

BTW, Howdy Stuk!

Yup yup yup , and the Buddha, an atheist, had his own quite exquisite version as well.

How ya doin, Pap? Do these guys in this forum know how D-Rec k is crowing about how none of them here can touch his unshakable thesis? How he is just mauling them here? I was poking around a couple of his threads here, and I get a rather different impression...

(May 26, 2012 at 10:34 pm)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:

(May 26, 2012 at 10:23 pm)FallentoReason Wrote: Well well well,blah blah blah...

When I need your advice I'll beat it out of you.

Did AF.com ban you?

Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: Do these guys in this forum know how D-Rec k is crowing about how none of them here can touch his unshakable thesis? How he is just mauling them here? I was poking around a couple of his threads here, and I get a rather different impression...

I get the impression the results are the same wherever that special little flower chooses to spread its petals.

(May 26, 2012 at 10:34 pm)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: Do these guys in this forum know how D-Rec k is crowing about how none of them here can touch his unshakable thesis? How he is just mauling them here? I was poking around a couple of his threads here, and I get a rather different impression...

Okay, I'll bite. Who is D-Rec k and what is his unshakable thesis? Sounds portentous.

Oh, wait a minute. Do you mean Drich? His drivel is merely pretentious. I've had him tuned out so long I forgot he was here.

(May 26, 2012 at 10:34 pm)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: Yup yup yup , and the Buddha, an atheist, had his own quite exquisite version as well.

I am not sure if the Buddha (Siddhattha Gotama) was a historical character. Especially given the earliest "biographies" (which have about as much myth as the Gospels) were written down centuries after he supposely lived. I believe that the various teachings of the Buddhist religion were later on attributed to a single person.

(May 26, 2012 at 10:12 pm)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:

(March 23, 2012 at 6:25 pm)Dreck Wrote: We have explored my willingness to open and research the bible, what say you? (as the golden rule is a biblical precept)

The 'golden rule" was only ripped off and put in the babble. An atheist espoused a far more detailed and profound ethics of reciprocity some 600 years before your mythical Jeebus. Of course, an arrogant xtard like you wouldn't have a clue about it, though.

What does this have to do with the evolution thread? or are you just trying a format where I did not immediately recognize your unicorn and move on? Why not start your own thread, and i promise so long as you stay on a biblically based topic, and can remain civil i will respond .

---

(May 26, 2012 at 10:23 pm)FallentoReason Wrote: Well well well, fancy seeing you here stuka.

P.s. Phil has been put in the Gauntlet for name calling and such. So take my advice and tone it down

I don't think that applies to Theists, otherwise a few more than just Phil would be in the gauntlet.

---

(May 26, 2012 at 10:23 pm)FallentoReason Wrote: Well well well, fancy seeing you here stuka.

P.s. Phil has been put in the Gauntlet for name calling and such. So take my advice and tone it down

I don't think that applies to Theists, otherwise a few more than just Phil would be in the gauntlet.

(May 27, 2012 at 1:49 am)Justtristo Wrote:

(May 26, 2012 at 10:34 pm)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: Yup yup yup , and the Buddha, an atheist, had his own quite exquisite version as well.

I am not sure if the Buddha (Siddhattha Gotama) was a historical character. Especially given the earliest "biographies" (which have about as much myth as the Gospels) were written down centuries after he supposely lived. I believe that the various teachings of the Buddhist religion were later on attributed to a single person.

Not a problem if he wasn't, actually. In fact it would tend to discredit much of the superstitious nonsense that tends to obscure the actual teachings, as it is all held up with argument from authority of their version(s) of a supernatural buddha/man.

---

(May 27, 2012 at 1:38 pm)Drich Wrote:

(May 26, 2012 at 10:12 pm)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: The 'golden rule" was only ripped off and put in the babble. An atheist espoused a far more detailed and profound ethics of reciprocity some 600 years before your mythical Jeebus. Of course, an arrogant xtard like you wouldn't have a clue about it, though.

What does this have to do with the evolution thread? or are you just trying a format where I did not immediately recognize your unicorn and move on? Why not start your own thread, and i promise so long as you stay on a biblically based topic, and can remain civil i will respond .

That's your name in the byline bleating on about the golden rule being a "biblical precept", right? You brought it up.

---

(May 27, 2012 at 1:25 am)whateverist Wrote:

(May 26, 2012 at 10:34 pm)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: Do these guys in this forum know how D-Rec k is crowing about how none of them here can touch his unshakable thesis? How he is just mauling them here? I was poking around a couple of his threads here, and I get a rather different impression...

Okay, I'll bite. Who is D-Rec k and what is his unshakable thesis? Sounds portentous.

Oh, wait a minute. Do you mean Drich? His drivel is merely pretentious. I've had him tuned out so long I forgot he was here.

Yeah, D-reck, as in Drich, as in DRECK.

Yeah he seems to have not been satisfied with the ass-whuppin he received here, so he came trolling over to atheistforums.COM to get his ass kicked a little more over there...