If I was Christian, my Jesus would be able to shoot laser beams from his eyes and smite the wicked with just his thoughts.

If I believed, life would be a lot more like this shit happening in Good Omens.

(March 18, 2013 at 2:56 pm)Faith No More Wrote: If I was Christian, my Jesus would be able to shoot laser beams from his eyes and smite the wicked with just his thoughts.

Don't forget the lightning bolts from his ass!

hmmm...

He walks on water, he floats in the sky, he heals disease, he raises from the dead .... umm yeah, I don't know why the hell they left the shape-shifting out? Seems totally plausible - right Drich!?

(March 17, 2013 at 6:53 pm)popeyespappy Wrote:

(March 17, 2013 at 4:52 pm)Godschild Wrote: That stuff does not even being to line up with the entirety of the NT, just because new writings are discovered does not mean they have truth in them.

I hate to be the bearer of bad news GC' but the NT doesn't line up with the entirety of itself.

You're doing what many here accuse Christians of doing, no examples of proof.

---

(March 17, 2013 at 6:16 pm)Persuade Me Wrote:

(March 17, 2013 at 4:52 pm)Godschild Wrote: That stuff does not even being to line up with the entirety of the NT, just because new writings are discovered does not mean they have truth in them.

Just because old writings were discovered, does not mean they have truth in them.

Good you understood what I meant.

---

(March 18, 2013 at 2:56 pm)Faith No More Wrote: If I was Christian, my Jesus would be able to shoot laser beams from his eyes and smite the wicked with just his thoughts.

My Jesus can do that, read the NT you might be surprised. Being Christian holds little water, being a Christian is the thing that matters. This is what I've argued in the past and will never differ from this.
Your statement sounds like this, being Jewish makes one a Jew, when reality says being a Jew makes one Jewish, if the one so chooses.

(March 18, 2013 at 11:04 pm)Godschild Wrote: [quote='popeyespappy' pid='416266' dateline='1363560834']
I hate to be the bearer of bad news GC' but the NT doesn't line up with the entirety of itself.

You're doing what many here accuse Christians of doing, no examples of proof.
LoL. The OP of the thread posted in right after you...

(March 18, 2013 at 11:15 pm)popeyespappy Wrote:

(March 18, 2013 at 11:04 pm)Godschild Wrote: [quote='popeyespappy' pid='416266' dateline='1363560834']
I hate to be the bearer of bad news GC' but the NT doesn't line up with the entirety of itself.

You're doing what many here accuse Christians of doing, no examples of proof.
LoL. The OP of the thread posted in right after you...

And how does this prove Jesus did not rise from the grave? The resurrection is the important part, the number of women and disciples, or the time of morning, has nothing to do with salvation and eternal life with God.

A. How does the NT prove that he did?

B. WTF does that have to do with the conversation?

Quote:And how does this prove Jesus did not rise from the grave? The resurrection is the important part, the number of women and disciples, or the time of morning, has nothing to do with salvation and eternal life with God.

What it shows is that the story is bullshit made up by different authors who could not agree on the details.

Now...add in the fact that none of it actually shows your godboy "resurrecting" and you have a serious problem.

(March 19, 2013 at 12:57 am)Godschild Wrote: And how does this prove Jesus did not rise from the grave? The resurrection is the important part, the number of women and disciples, or the time of morning, has nothing to do with salvation and eternal life with God.

The last few people to see that list tend to comment on the minor discrepancies shown, even though there are a total of ten discrepancies in the list, and not all of them minor. Taken as a whole, along with other contradictions and mistakes, and it's hard to believe that it's just a few differences in recollection that is driving the many issues with consistency.