(May 31, 2013 at 1:59 am)dazzn Wrote: no, i know that many younger people need dominance (lol) when nobody has to submit to them. I understand how they think and I know the score.

1: If I was a younger person and younger people need dominance... why am the slave in a S&M relationship?
2: Nobody has to submit to anyone... which is to say: if that man with a gun doesn't like something you're doing, he is completely free to shoot you. Other people with guns may find issue with that, and they may not... regardless, they are free to do what they will.
3: You don't have the slightest clue how Silicoid think... it might do you some good to understand their greatest philosophical observation: "Is it rock?"
4: What's the game you know the score to?

(May 31, 2013 at 1:59 am)dazzn Wrote: no, i know that many younger people need dominance (lol) when nobody has to submit to them. I understand how they think and I know the score.

Does this bit of erudition come from 'normal knowledge', which you claim to be denied; or, is this a result of some 'special knowledge'?

(May 31, 2013 at 2:03 am)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote:

(May 31, 2013 at 1:59 am)dazzn Wrote: no, i know that many younger people need dominance (lol) when nobody has to submit to them. I understand how they think and I know the score.

1: If I was a younger person and younger people need dominance... why am the slave in a S&M relationship?
2: Nobody has to submit to anyone... which is to say: if that man with a gun doesn't like something you're doing, he is completely free to shoot you. Other people with guns may find issue with that, and they may not... regardless, they are free to do what they will.
3: You don't have the slightest clue how Silicoid think... it might do you some good to understand their greatest philosophical observation: "Is it rock?"
4: What's the game you know the score to?

1 - don't let reality frighten you
2 - hmmm.. this is why people always rise up against dominance lol.. if you presume you hold an absolute right to dominate others, so be it, but i doubt the vast majority in the world who exist now or ever have existed would agree. you all cited north korea, yet i will cite syria as a counter-argument.
3 - No, but I understand how the many think, including many younger people.
4 - either you're autistic, or cannot comprehend different linguistic contexts.

---

(May 31, 2013 at 2:07 am)cato123 Wrote:

(May 31, 2013 at 1:59 am)dazzn Wrote: no, i know that many younger people need dominance (lol) when nobody has to submit to them. I understand how they think and I know the score.

Does this bit of erudition come from 'normal knowledge', which you claim to be denied; or, is this a result of some 'special knowledge'?

No, simple logic.

(May 31, 2013 at 2:09 am)dazzn Wrote:

(May 31, 2013 at 2:07 am)cato123 Wrote: Does this bit of erudition come from 'normal knowledge', which you claim to be denied; or, is this a result of some 'special knowledge'?

No, simple logic.

Your posts betray your inability to reason, logic be damned. Your logic may be sound, but considering your self described 'normal knowledge' deprivation, your premises are likely fucked on arrival so your logical conclusions are patently false.

(May 31, 2013 at 2:20 am)cato123 Wrote:

(May 31, 2013 at 2:09 am)dazzn Wrote: No, simple logic.

Your posts betray your inability to reason, logic be damned. Your logic may be sound, but considering your self described 'normal knowledge' deprivation, your premises are likely fucked on arrival so your logical conclusions are patently false.

His logic may be sound, were it not for his habit of violating the law of non-contradiction.

lol.. says you all who believe that humans never challenge authority. or presume some "existent and absolute" right to control others lol.. is this why you'll post that bullying is wrong in another thread?

You know, my "contradictions" are actually based on how many people behave, on this forum at least.

(May 31, 2013 at 2:22 am)dazzn Wrote: You know, my "contradictions" are actually based on how many people behave, on this forum at least.

So says the guy who claims that morals don't exist, while at the same time invoking moral claims.

(May 31, 2013 at 2:09 am)dazzn Wrote:

(May 31, 2013 at 2:03 am)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote: 1: If I was a younger person and younger people need dominance... why am the slave in a S&M relationship?
2: Nobody has to submit to anyone... which is to say: if that man with a gun doesn't like something you're doing, he is completely free to shoot you. Other people with guns may find issue with that, and they may not... regardless, they are free to do what they will.
3: You don't have the slightest clue how Silicoid think... it might do you some good to understand their greatest philosophical observation: "Is it rock?"
4: What's the game you know the score to?

1 - don't let reality frighten you

^ Totally irrelevant to the question, but you know that.

Quote:2 - hmmm.. this is why people always rise up against dominance lol.. if you presume you hold an absolute right to dominate others, so be it, but i doubt the vast majority in the world who exist now or ever have existed would agree. you all cited north korea, yet i will cite syria as a counter-argument.

People 'rising up against dominance' is dominating behavior That is to say: hypocritical.

Rights don't enter into it (at all, they are illusory, infact). You can do anything which you can do... I know you struggle with logic, but there it is. Others are also able to do anything they can do... if a group of these hookers get together and decide 'let's lock that fucker up or kill him': can they do that? This is the 'crux' of society: what does <arbitrary set> believe it can enforce... what does it enforce?

Welcome to elementary knowledge. Is this the normal knowledge which you seek (something about fucking your mother... don't worry, women can't rape women. There's nothing wrong with it)?

Quote:3 - No, but I understand how the many think, including many younger people.

No... you don't understand the Silicoid. I'm gladdened by your recognition of your inability here... it's refreshing.

Maybe you do understand how the many think... in your mind. Especially your caricatures of younger people Does it discomfort you to know that your oldest human is extremely young? Of course it doesn't.

Quote:4 - either you're autistic, or cannot comprehend different linguistic contexts.

Evidently, you are unaware of the existence of sarcasm, misdirection, AND expressions of disbelief as questions. All three at once as a singular literary device? Please... let's not pretend that dazzn is capable of engaging an average adult with on-level English: it would be a major hypothetical, and we've seen no reason that'd suggest it happening... ever.

You know that autistic people *really* know what they know, right? Maybe she doesn't know that, having never met an autistic person before, and all...

(May 31, 2013 at 2:22 am)dazzn Wrote: lol.. says you all who believe that humans never challenge authority. or presume some "existent and absolute" right to control others lol.. is this why you'll post that bullying is wrong in another thread?

You know, my "contradictions" are actually based on how many people behave, on this forum at least.

Substantiate your claims.

Who exactly said humans never challenge authority, let alone 'you all'?
Who proclaimed some 'existent and absolute' right to control others? Who exactly? Give me one fucking example.

Where are all these contradictions you claim exist?

You are in dire need of the generous services I offered before.

But in all seriousness. Is this kind of trolling fun?